Some stats for the game

[swantastic]

In the Hun BOG for the Swans Rok,Leo.Jolly,Kirk,Crouch,Ablett agree with most of them but not ROK IMO,Fossie should have been in there.
Most efficient,
Hall=93%
Schneider=90%
Leo=91%
Crouch=93%

Every body else was in the 63% to 83% eff rate.

The worst of the lot was Nick Davis with 33% but as per usually they didnt kick it to him,but he didnt present enough and spat the dummy a few times.

Clangers
ROK=7:(
Jolly=4
every body else with 1 to 3,but Leo didnt have any at all.

Tackles
Fossie=7:)
B1/Kirk=5:)
Ablett/McVeigh=4
Then every body else with 1 to 3,but on the down side Spida,Davis and Moore had none.
Any body else need stats just ask.:D
What i cant work out was Goodes 56% Eff rate.His figures show a lot better than that.

[ROK Lobster]

Game time for Davis, Schmidt, Moore, Bolton J, Kirk - oh well the lot of them if you can.

[swantastic]

Fossie=80%
Baz=100%
Schneider=72%
MOL=86%
Leo=100%
Jolly=73%
Melcho=98%
Ablett=75%
Spida=70%
B1=82%
Crouch=90%
Kirk=88%
Benny=94%
McVeigh=67%
Goodes=100%
Jack=94%
B2=100%
Schmidt=57%
ROK=97%
Teddy=97%
Davis=61%
Moore=20%

[liz]

Moore=20%

That one is just plain bizarre. Why take a guy into the game and then not play him? Surely halfway through the first quarter when we were getting smashed in the midfield it would have made sense to stick him in the centre and see if he could change things around.

[swantastic]

That one is just plain bizarre. Why take a guy into the game and then not play him? Surely halfway through the first quarter when we were getting smashed in the midfield it would have made sense to stick him in the centre and see if he could change things around.Yep agree,stats for Moore 1K,2HB's,1 uncon mark,1 con pos,2 uncon poss,1 clearence,1 clanger,1 FA and thats it:(

[ROK Lobster]

That one is just plain bizarre. Why take a guy into the game and then not play him? Surely halfway through the first quarter when we were getting smashed in the midfield it would have made sense to stick him in the centre and see if he could change things around.
And this is odd in that context too


Jack=94%

[ROK Lobster]

Sorry ROK a typo Jack 83%
Thanks Jack. Still plenty of time.

[swantastic]

On player rankings those that were up were,Fossie,Hall,Schneider,MOL,Leo,Ablett,Crouch,B enny,McVeigh

On the down side,Jolly,Melcho,B2,Kirk,Goodes,B1,Schmidt,ROK,Te dd,Davis,Moore

Those that were stagnate were,JackSpida.

[smasher]

Do you think maybe they forgot about Moore? How on earth is he meant to get game time when he misses playing in the ressies to fill in for the seniors and then gets 20 minutes on the park in the ones.I don't understand but I do wonder if Roos plays favourites sometimes.

[Lucky Knickers]

Do you think maybe they forgot about Moore? How on earth is he meant to get game time when he misses playing in the ressies to fill in for the seniors and then gets 20 minutes on the park in the ones.I don't understand but I do wonder if Roos plays favourites sometimes.

Are you kidding? Moore would have been happy to help Baz into his jockstrap rather than be in Canberra.

[Snake]

Do you think maybe they forgot about Moore? How on earth is he meant to get game time when he misses playing in the ressies to fill in for the seniors and then gets 20 minutes on the park in the ones.I don't understand but I do wonder if Roos plays favourites sometimes.

Roos does play favorites, how in the hell McVeigh gets game time instead of Bevan is just plain bizarre..