2007 Scorecard - #39 Heath Grundy

[AnnieH]

Rate away ...

[ScottH]

Hasn't been able to get things going, since his Debut game. I have high hopes for him.

3/10

[2005]

Dud !!
Not up to it , simple as that.Played his blinder against a shocking Richmond side when no body knew him.
Has hardly touched it since.
This will be last chance, would love Reg to stick it up me.
1/10

[573v30]

2/10 - Barely noticed in his 8 games kicking only 1.1 this year. The Swans must have faith in him if they've kept him instead of Vogels, 2008 is the make-or-break year for him and will most likely stay in the forward line if he is to avoid the chopping block.

[RogueSwan]

1.5/10. Never thought he was any good and last year proved it. Hopefully whatever the coaches see comes through this year.

[Zlatorog]

2/10 for me

[AnnieH]

2.5/10.

Poor Reg. He showed such promise.
I hate it when they do that to me.

[Robbo]

He never got to play in his natural position. Roos put him at full back at one stage - He's a full forward Paul.

I think he's worth holding on to. Baz and Mick won't be there much longer.

[Xie Shan]

He never got to play in his natural position. Roos put him at full back at one stage - He's a full forward Paul.

I think he's worth holding on to. Baz and Mick won't be there much longer.

Grundy in the goalsquare, O'Loughlin in the pocket and Hall out to CHF was what I was thinking. Would be worth a try if all three are fit, anyway.

[Robbo]

Grundy in the goalsquare, O'Loughlin in the pocket and Hall out to CHF was what I was thinking. Would be worth a try if all three are fit, anyway.

That would be worth a try. But can you really imagine a player who didn't play in any of the GF's being given a role in a key position?

[Jewels]

2/10

I can't believe he played eight games!
I hope they put him back in the forwards this year, he's clearly not a back.

[BeeEmmAre]

Reggie is definitely no dud.
I believe he is a genuine full forward, but IIRC he hasn't played there since that great debut against Port.
I'm salivating at the thought of a forward line of:
HF: Davis, Hall, O'Keefe
F: Everitt, Grundy, O'Loughlin
Please, Roosy, please.

On this year's form, disappointing because he was played out of position - just because he may have been a full back at junior level, doesn't make him one now.

3/10.

[bennyfrou]

2/10

[2005]

Reggie is definitely no dud.
I believe he is a genuine full forward, but IIRC he hasn't played there since that great debut against Port.
I'm salivating at the thought of a forward line of:
HF: Davis, Hall, O'Keefe
F: Everitt, Grundy, O'Loughlin
Please, Roosy, please.

On this year's form, disappointing because he was played out of position - just because he may have been a full back at junior level, doesn't make him one now.

3/10.

Hope your right mate , had plenty of chances down forward as well after his debut against the Tigers. and couldnt get a kick .

[Nico]

Struggled for mine but much in the same bracket as Vogels, used sparingly and in the wrong position. - 3/10

[reigning premier]

2/10....

Crap. Never looked like doing anything this year. Never looked like he was up to the grade.

Can't believe we kept him!

[bennyfrou]

2/10....

Crap. Never looked like doing anything this year. Never looked like he was up to the grade.

Can't believe we kept him!

Agree with you on this one...

[Bleed Red Blood]

That would be worth a try. But can you really imagine a player who didn't play in any of the GF's being given a role in a key position?

Must be why we play Everitt as a wingman.

[bedford]

3/10
limited opportunities,when he did play forward he led hard but they wouldn't kick it to him,he would lead straight up the ground and mick and barry would lead to the flanks and with our predictable play we would go out wide.

[BeeEmmAre]

Heath Grundy scorecard

3, 1, 2, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 3

Total score = 28/130

Average = 2.15/10

Grundy fails.