PDA

View Full Version : Holland / Williams incident forces AFL crackdown



SWANSBEST
18th December 2003, 06:18 AM
AFL decides to go in hard with off-the-ball incidents
December 18, 2003


The AFL yesterday announced a crackdown on off-the-ball incidents following the outcry over Collingwood tagger Brodie Holland's lenient suspension for striking Sydney's Paul Williams last season.

Players involved in behind-the-play violence can expect stiffer sentences next season as a result of a post-season tribunal review.

In other initiatives, contact with an umpire is likely to be punished with a fine rather than suspension in the first instance and

live television coverage of tribunal hearings is also a step closer. The AFL will meet Players' Association and Fox Footy channel representatives to discuss live tribunal coverage.

There was outcry over the Holland case, when the Magpie escaped with a two-week ban for hitting Williams on the head while the Swans star was not looking. At the time, Sydney coach Paul Roos said criticism of the short ban was "pretty much spot-on".

"The football public does not tolerate, and frowns upon off-ball incidents," AFL boss Andrew Demetriou said yesterday. "They are looking for off-the-ball incidents to be dealt with severely - on-field violence has no place in AFL football."

The AFL also has introduced several new rules for the pre-season Wizard Cup,

including any ball that hits a post and stays in play remains alive, and marks in the goal square being rewarded with a shot on goal from directly in front.

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/12/17/1071337032206.html

dendol
18th December 2003, 03:40 PM
dirty little @@@@@@. I saw the incident again last night on Sports Tonight and it got me all worked up again.

dimelb
18th December 2003, 09:47 PM
A real cheap shot. And there were others: Davis against Essendon, Goodes against Essendon, Cressa against Port for instance. In two of those we got goals, but only because we were down that end of the ground. It'd be interesting to give a free in the goal square as a routine penalty for these incidents, as well as whatever the tribunal comes up with.

penga
19th December 2003, 03:03 PM
Originally posted by dimelb
Davis against Essendon, Goodes against Essendon, Cressa against Port for instance.

davis - mcveigh?
goodes - ???
cresswell - ???

dimelb
19th December 2003, 09:41 PM
Originally posted by penga
davis - mcveigh?
goodes - ???
cresswell - ???

Goodes had his head collected by (I think) one of the Johnsons' hips as he was getting up off the ground, same game as Davis.
Cressa's was in the finals against Port - forget who collected him.

chammond
20th December 2003, 01:31 PM
Johnson's hit on Goodes was really weird. The ball was out, Goodes was on his knees and Johnson ran straight at him and hit him in the head with his hip. It wasn't a hard hit, but it deliberately targetted Goodes' head and it knocked him back down.

The umpire was only a couple of metres away . . . Goodes looked to him and asked the question, and the ump just turned his back and ran off.

If it had been someone like Buckley or Lloyd on the receiving end, it would have made the front page of the Hun. But as it was, it barely rated a mention anywhere. Not even a free kick?!

Benevolent Ert
20th December 2003, 02:04 PM
and if it had been Wanganeen on the receiving end it would've been a free kick, a 50 metre penalty and another shot if he missed the goal