Not Carolyn Wilson by any chance are we.Originally posted by Carolyn
He's not much use to us if he doesn't improve.
Not Carolyn Wilson by any chance are we.Originally posted by Carolyn
He's not much use to us if he doesn't improve.
lolOriginally posted by Nico
Not Carolyn Wilson by any chance are we.I don't think Carolyn Wilson's still in school.
My Pokemon brings all the boys to the yard and they're like "Wanna trade cards?"
"Damn right, I wanna trade cards. I can beat you, I've got Charizard!"
Without getting a kick?Originally posted by GoBloods
Might have kicked started his season.
Multidimensional ruckmen? Oh Melbournehammer. Next thing you'll be telling me they can be taught to speak!!!
FWIW ~ My attitude to RWO is best summed up in the "About Me" bit of my profile
Originally posted by SwanSong
He has abot 10% of the talent Benny Mathews has...
And you guys want to sack benny!!!!
Give Chambers the ass...
What's 10% of FA??
Rather 10% of 5'10" when you're actually 6'8" (??), didn't see mathews giving the ruckmen much of a contest for hitouts, I am by no means convinced that Chambers is going to be a good ruckman, but the ruck isn't just about stats, now, is it.
The only thing guaranteed when Benny gets the ball, is an unspectacular result, probably not the worst player in the league but maybe least interesting to watch play footy.
Which might not be such a bad thing after seeing his kicks against Melbourne.Originally posted by Ruckman
Without getting a kick?
I reckon give him some time. Rucking is a skill that can take a while to develop and he's certainly improving on his earlier efforts (still a way to go, tho').
With game time & confidence he might become useful.
Agent 99: "Did you see anything?"
Maxwell Smart: "Just once, but I don't think you expected him to lift you so high."
Just saw the replay of the game and it is amazing how much this guy chases hard for the ball or man when the ball is in dispute.
Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.
. . . . . unfortunately on those few occasions that he catches someone it tends to result in a free against.Originally posted by Jeffers1984
Just saw the replay of the game and it is amazing how much this guy chases hard for the ball or man when the ball is in dispute.
I'm still a definite "No Sale" on Paul but I do acknowledge this aspect of his play. Although I'm more pleased to see the improvement in his ruckwork (I hope it wasn't just because it was against the Cats), this week against the Lions will be a BIG test.
Multidimensional ruckmen? Oh Melbournehammer. Next thing you'll be telling me they can be taught to speak!!!
FWIW ~ My attitude to RWO is best summed up in the "About Me" bit of my profile
Well I've never heard of a run-with ruckman but maybe that's exactly the role that Roos has asked him to play.
Bump.....
As requested, the correct Paul Chambers thread for the front page
Looking out for good omens which can bring the Swans the 2007 premiership
My kids had chicken pox and they were all red and white, that's one
Paul Chambers. 72 hit outs. Ranked #18 in the AFL. 18th is not bad for a #2 ruckman.
Jolly is #6 with 123.
http://afl.com.au/default.asp?pg=sta...icType=HITOUTS
"Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi final
We won by 118 points.
Chambers had 12 HO, 0 kicks, 0 HB, 3 tackles.
I choose the carbon rod
...providing we can find one 6'8" or longer.
Then again, I'm sure I said the same thing about LRT. What do I know?
A ruckman like Cox/Fraser in the Subiaco game would have had an absolute field day against Richmond today. Would have been another option up forward to further stretch the terrible defence.Originally posted by midaro
We won by 118 points.
Chambers had 12 HO, 0 kicks, 0 HB, 3 tackles.
I choose the carbon rod
...providing we can find one 6'8" or longer.
Then again, I'm sure I said the same thing about LRT. What do I know?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks