i think our youngsters look more capable than first thought and theres a vibe the club will be making changes to game plan and team structure to round one, as opposed to being more preapared.
Swans - more than 40 points
Swans - between 20 and 39 points
Swans - between 10 and 19 points
Swans - between 1 and 9 points
Match Drawn
St. Kilda - between 1 and 9 points
St. Kilda - between 10 and 19 points
St. Kilda - between 20 and 39 points
St. Kilda - more than 40 points
i think our youngsters look more capable than first thought and theres a vibe the club will be making changes to game plan and team structure to round one, as opposed to being more preapared.
Theres not much left to say
When?Originally Posted by swansrule100
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."
He's not been happy. We pushed the Hawks all the way with a very inexperienced side, then we thumped the Power, so he had nothing to be negative about. We lose to Richmond, and voila!
(No malice intended)
It depends on who we play (ie which end they regard as theirs - visitors get the other).
just meant havent seen u post for a while, enjoy ur comments on the swans and afl in general,
Theres not much left to say
Ta - I was away for a bit and taking it easy away from here as well.
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."
With one week to go, I am going to say I think we can beat the Saints by about 2-3 goals.
The Saints are going to destroy us in the ruck. If you ask me, White HAS to play if we're to have any chance, but even if he does play, with Everitt out, Saints by 18.
Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!
White's not going to play next week, especially not in the ruck. He played today and didn't contest a single centre bounce (that I saw, anyway). When Currie was resting off the ground, top-up no 50 did most of the centre bounce work. Once they even sent Faulks in there.
Wow. That seems really....odd. I know he's undersized, but surely he'd be a better option than Faulks. I still think it would be crazy not to play him against St Kilda, playing him mostly forward but rotating him through the ruck. Surely it would be better than leaving backup ruck duties to LRT and Richards?
Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!
I will sit near nuff nuffs like Swantastic & his pesky kids!More time off to prepare.
I dont think so.
I will sit as usual down with the nuff nuffs from the cheer squad.
JF
"Never ever ever state that Sydney is gone.They are like cockroaches in the aftermath of a nuclear war"
(Forum poster 'Change', Big Footy 04Apr09)
Put LRT in the ruck & the problem is at least reduced if not solved.
LRT is NOT a Centre Half Back. He is just being played there because we lack height in defence (& because players like Richards just haven't come on the way they should have)
JF
"Never ever ever state that Sydney is gone.They are like cockroaches in the aftermath of a nuclear war"
(Forum poster 'Change', Big Footy 04Apr09)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks