Ahh yes my bad, of course dimwit play for North and Hawthorn.
As for IC rules. why can't there just be the stewards there, and once a player comes into the IC area another can go on (injuries of course excepted)
Ahh yes my bad, of course dimwit play for North and Hawthorn.
As for IC rules. why can't there just be the stewards there, and once a player comes into the IC area another can go on (injuries of course excepted)
Premiers 09,18,33,05
"You Irish Twit", Quote attributed to a RWO member who shall remain nameless.
Seems the rule makers don't even know what's going on....... How the hell is anyone else going to work it out??
Morons....
AFL to fine itself $25,000...... Well maybe not...
An own-goal for the AFL, congratulations...
I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!!
At one stage during Saturday's match against Power; for almost a minute, the swans had SIX on the bench. The commentators were going great guns over it.
Stoopid rule.
Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.
that was why I suggested that it should be LAW that if anyone is to hold down a senior position at the AFL they must have played at least 105 games at senior level. This would eliminate Demetriou (he played 103) and Anderson (ZERO) immediately - yet this idea was poo pooed by some! But this interchange rule is a farce - I'm sure that at one point we had 6 on the interchange on Saturday - its a joke!
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!
Common sense is prevailing.
AFL writes off interchange notification
I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!!
You really have to wonder if the AFL is a professional organisation at all. Complete hacks run this game.
Bookmarks