Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 13 to 22 of 22

Thread: Brownlow votes: just how wrong did the umps get it?

  1. #13
    Support Staff Claret's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,104
    Quote Originally Posted by ugg View Post
    How did Jack get votes in Round 3? 11 possessions, 50 Champion Data ranking points. Hardly earth-shattering.
    Keeping Luke Power to 4 kicks and 5 handballs is a pretty fair effort, particularly considering he had 51 possessions over the previous two weeks.
    And the man who started it all, the Schneiderman . . . . .

  2. #14
    Can you feel it? Site Admin ugg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Chucked into the ruck
    Posts
    15,934
    Quote Originally Posted by Claret View Post
    Keeping Luke Power to 4 kicks and 5 handballs is a pretty fair effort, particularly considering he had 51 possessions over the previous two weeks.
    Fair enough. But it usually isn't the sort of game that umpires vote for. Just found it strange.

  3. #15
    Support Staff Claret's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,104
    Quote Originally Posted by ugg View Post
    Fair enough. But it usually isn't the sort of game that umpires vote for. Just found it strange.
    I agree that it's usually not the sort of game that the umps vote for. Not sure if this is a good thing?

    I think as of last season the umpires were given access to the stats before submitting their votes - this probably highlights the job of taggers a little more.
    And the man who started it all, the Schneiderman . . . . .

  4. #16
    RWOs Black Sheep AnnieH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    At Goodesy's Place
    Posts
    11,332
    Quote Originally Posted by AussieAnge View Post
    I thought that was Annie's job
    It is, and I do such a fab job and all.

    Goodesy polled 5th overall.

    The umpires obviously have a totally different view to the majority of nay-sayers in this place.

    Goodesy (even at half strength) is a freakin legend.

    He rates very high in the eyes of the umps - even when he plays like @@@@.

    Onya Goodesy. Try not to get suspended next year and you should be up for your third charlie.

    (Even I didn't rate Goodesy as the highest ranking Swan - like most, I said the Hippy.)
    Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
    Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

  5. #17
    Peyow Peyow Mike_B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Morningside for life!
    Posts
    6,267
    Quote Originally Posted by goswannie14 View Post
    You need to get the umpires to realise that too.

    How many, "non-midfelders" have won it? Not many.
    Have to go back to the early 90s for a non-midfielder to have won, when it went to Ruckmen in 91/92 (Stynes/Wynd).

    I'm on the Chandwagon!!!

    If you cannot compete for the premiership, it's better to be young and exciting than middle-aged and dowdy.


  6. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike_B View Post
    Have to go back to the early 90s for a non-midfielder to have won, when it went to Ruckmen in 91/92 (Stynes/Wynd).
    I think you'll find the most recent non-midfielder who won was Gavin Wanganeen in 1993. Officially his position was Back Pocket, though he was more of a modern Running Back (think Kennelly).

    Then there was:
    Stynes - Ruck
    Wynd - Ruck
    Lockett - Full Forward (1987 - tied)
    Quinlan - CHF/CHB (1981 - tied)
    Blight - Full Forward (1978)

    ...

    There are others going back further, and while the Midfielders (including wings) dominate, they are by no means alone.
    10100111001 ;-)

  7. #19
    Senior Player Plugger46's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    3,674
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike_B View Post
    Have to go back to the early 90s for a non-midfielder to have won, when it went to Ruckmen in 91/92 (Stynes/Wynd).
    Goodesy won in 2003 as a ruckman. Still a midfielder though I guess.
    Bloods

    "Lockett is the best of all time" - Robert Harvey, Darrel Baldock, Nathan Burke, Kevin Bartlett, Bob Skilton

  8. #20
    Veterans List
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    11,142
    It just makes you wonder how many Brownlows Goodes would have won by now if he hadn't had female problems and went silly mid season, and hadn't done the groin. He had that bad patch last year that probably cost him also.

    If he hadn't been reported and didn't do the groin he would have won by a country mile and we probably would have finished fourth.

    He could conceivably have had 4 Brownlows and been hailed the greatest of all time.

  9. #21
    Regular in the Side
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Croydon, Sydney.
    Posts
    988
    Quote Originally Posted by Nico View Post
    He could conceivably have had 4 Brownlows and been hailed the greatest of all time.
    there's still time yet!!

  10. #22
    Regular in the Side
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    newtown
    Posts
    940
    i wonder if the umps are going to mark goodes harder now.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO