Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: AFL's Revamped Drug Rules

  1. #1
    RWOs Black Sheep AnnieH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    At Goodesy's Place
    Posts
    11,332

    AFL's Revamped Drug Rules

    They should be retrospective.

    Tough anti-drug rule wont derail disgraced ex-west coke budgie fallen star cousins' comeback


    AFL boss Andrew Demetriou said on Monday that a team could have a win taken away from it if there was evidence that one player who had played a significant role in that game had tested positive to drugs on match day.
    What is a "significant" role. How many touches do you think you have to have before your game is considered "significant".

    Idiots and their idiot loopholes.

    Discuss.
    Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
    Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

  2. #2
    What nonsense...so if a player has a positive match day test, but only played an 'insignificant role' ...no action will be taken?...Truly Pathetic

  3. #3
    On the bandwagon... 573v30's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Perth, WA :(
    Posts
    5,017
    Well, it's opposite when players get into serious off-field incidents: the hacks are delisted but the stars are protected.
    I only support one team: The SYDNEY SWANS!!!!!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO