For 2009, I'm not sure that that's such a positive any more. We just have too many spots to fill (in what's purportedly a weak draft, but once you get past pick 60 I'd be surprised if there's any statistical difference between "strong" drafts and weak ones).
This on the face of it suggests that we have 4 spots to fill, but in fact it's at least 6 and as many as 9. That is to say, Schmidt and Kennelly are already listed in the 34; then 2 of Kirk, Goodes and JBolt can be 'outside veterans' (creating a 40-man list). Then there's the prospect of Playfair's hammie not coming up to speed, which would be the 9th senior vacancy.
Even if we upgrade both Pike and Thornton (is there any point upgrading Orreal or Gilchrist?), that will potentially leave us with 6 or 7 slots to fill. Even if we nab Bradshaw, that's likely to be just too many untested young players to add. (Maybe one of DOK or-- please-- Laidlaw might get to slip in through the side door again.)
We may well decide not to list
any outside veterans for a reason that hadn't occurred to me before-- there is simply not enough talent available in 2009 to give us 40 senior list players worthy of the name, and we would rather keep our powder dry and have the option of expanding our squad in future years.
Bookmarks