Jack can take reprimand..

[Lucky Knickers]

The report says "He has no existing good or bad record"

and went on to comment that this is likely because he is the son of rugby league great, Gary Jack.

[liz]

The first thing I thought when I saw the Guerra tackle was I wonder if it will receive the same scrutiny that Mumford's received - seems it has. I still think two weeks is a bit rough (for both Mumford and Guerra) though.

Agree. And other tackles that have looked as bad, if not worse, have gone unpunished.

[707]

and thats the problem, very similar incidents don't get reported. Mummy was really stiff, the one against ROK earlier in the year went untouched but had far geater repercussions for the tackled player. Similar ones since Mummy haven't been reported.

[Bas]

Gerard Healy has just annointed Jack as the new Kirk for the Swans.

[goswannie14]

That's not the way it works. You have to have an X year clean record to get the good behaviour discount. If you've been in the system fewer than X years you don't get it. I just can't recall off the top of my head what X is. If I had to hazard a guess I would say probably 5. Jack was drafted in the 2005 rookie draft, which means this is his 5th year. So he doesn't quite have a 5 year clean record.

Pretty sure it's 3 years, not 5.

[BSA5]

Gerard Healy has just annointed Jack as the new Kirk for the Swans.

Strikes me more as a Kelly (and hopefully he'll be somewhere near as good!). Quick, tough as nails, classy without being particularly silky, and can really hit a team where it hurts. Real impact player.

[ugg]

Pretty sure it's 3 years, not 5.

If it's three years then Jack would qualify. He didn't so it's obviously more

[BSA5]

If it's three years then Jack would qualify. He didn't so it's obviously more

Three years from debut, perhaps? Or maybe rookie years don't count. Or maybe Jack has done something minor in the past which we've all forgotten about. Do you think that $5 bet he put on ages ago might matter?

[ugg]

Three years from debut, perhaps? Or maybe rookie years don't count. Or maybe Jack has done something minor in the past which we've all forgotten about. Do you think that $5 bet he put on ages ago might matter?

Google afl tribunal "good record" and the first result is a PDF where the extract states it's five years. So you may have found a loophole. Draft a sniper, play him in the reserves for five years and unleash havoc in the sixth

[i'm-uninformed2]

Jack's a pearler. Kelly, Kirk . . . Either way, better than being the new Stefan Carey.

[Primmy]

Guerra's tackle was also late, that's probably why the 2 weeker.....anyway he probably deserves it for other past crimes that snuck through....mind you it would have had to be over hard if a bloke like Mal has a bit of trouble staying on his feet.

Glad Kizza got a short one and reprimand. He is a hard player, but have never seen him doing anything I would be ashamed of as a Swan supporter.

Apparently his first quarter was the best of any afl player recorded , which is outstanding no matter how you look at it. Maybe why he had a feather of leniency.

[Jewels]

Gerard Healy has just annointed Jack as the new Kirk for the Swans.

Strikes me more as a Kelly (and hopefully he'll be somewhere near as good!). Quick, tough as nails, classy without being particularly silky, and can really hit a team where it hurts. Real impact player.

I took it as more the inspirational type rather than the playing style.
And I agree. He already seems like he'd bleed for the club in the same way Kirk and Jude do.