Who says? The guy who should have been the one Captain
Sole skipper for Swans? - AFL.com.au
Who says? The guy who should have been the one Captain
Sole skipper for Swans? - AFL.com.au
Red and white till I die
Horse hinted that this was a possibility on Fox Sports yesterday, but was leaving his options wide open.
How long have I been saying that for?
Goodesy for captain.
B2 in the vice squad.
Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.
Yep, get back to the good old, one captain, one vice captain and a couple of deputy vice captains.
Does God believe in Atheists?
"Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017
Change for change's sake.
I never liked the idea of multiple captains, but it seems to have worked well for the Swans, so why change now?
The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.
Last edited by Damien; 13th November 2010 at 06:17 PM. Reason: stuff ups.
Not really. If nobody else fits the bill for a full-time captaincy role, and Bolton's body is considered too much of a worry, then leaving Goodes as sole captain would seem the logical step. Promoting two more players would be three captains for three captains' sake.
Horse is a new coach, this is a new phase for the club. He will do whatever he feels is best for the club. If that means changing the captaincy structure, then that's his call, and it will be for a reason.
Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!
Goodes should be sole captain IMO
Not if the reason for having three captains in the first place was to share the load and to take advantage of complementary skill sets required in captaincy.
I don't particularly care if we have one captain, three captains or 47 captains - but I don't think it should be assumed anything is done just for the sake of it.
Of course. But if it wasn't deemed necessary, then maintaining it would be maintaining it for its own sake. I'm not saying that if two more players are promoted, that will be the case, but going back to one captain wouldn't be for its own sake either... if you get what I mean. Basically, whatever happens with the captaincy will happen for a reason.
Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!
Bookmarks