Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 25 to 36 of 81

Thread: Teams: Sydney v Essendon

  1. #25
    i felt we carried around 5 players last weekend and almost won against a white hot lightening fast Dee's on our dead end field the MCG

    I felt, in part what kept us in the game was having the 3 very fast tall leading players............it made the matchups difficult for Melb

    Given ROK played a fair bit in the backs last week and will again where needed this week and most backs played 90% plus of the game and did a pretty good job - I would suggest :

    White, Bird, Rohan, Sumner

    But Sumner will get to play a little more midfield and sub into the backs only when the place a small fast midfielder up there in the Forwards
    "be tough, only when it gets tough"


  2. #26
    My bet is Meredith will be the sub. Pyke will rest in Defence, Mummy in the forward line when Pyke is rucking.

  3. #27
    My best guess is Pyke wont play,i think Mummy will ruck when Hille rucks and White when Ryder does,yes we loose out in the ruck but Jesse has the pace to go with Ryder around the ground i dont think Pyke does,Bird will be the sub imo.

  4. #28
    Captain of the Side Captain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Northern Beaches
    Posts
    3,576
    I think the bench will be: White Rohan Bird with the substitute being Meredith

  5. #29
    On the veteran's list
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Swans Heartland
    Posts
    2,236
    Some people must be out of their minds. There is no way you could risk Pyke playing a KP backman. You need years of developing footy smarts.
    Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

  6. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Royboy View Post
    Everyone won't win and the teams chances of winning is diminished if "CCC" Bevan remains in the starting 22. (courage, clangers and crook goalkicking). Bevans DNA will not change (according to Roos anyway) and I have long been of the opinion that his clangers and crook goalkicking cause far more damage than his courage is worth.
    His courage is undenialable, his goalkicking is generally good but his clangers are unbearably bad. If he plays, and I am sure he will as he is listed, I hope he plays in the forward line where his clangers will not be as costly as down back.

  7. #31
    Veterans List Bas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Gosford - Central Coast
    Posts
    4,457
    Quote Originally Posted by The Big Cat View Post
    Some people must be out of their minds. There is no way you could risk Pyke playing a KP backman. You need years of developing footy smarts.
    I am out of my mind. It helps me deal with reality!

    Tell that to Karmichael Hunt and GC.
    In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.

  8. #32
    Formerly 'BBB' Triple B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    6,999
    Quote Originally Posted by On-Baller View Post
    My best guess is Pyke wont play,i think Mummy will ruck when Hille rucks and White when Ryder does,yes we loose out in the ruck but Jesse has the pace to go with Ryder around the ground i dont think Pyke does,Bird will be the sub imo.
    Personally I think Pyke is much better equipped to run with Ryder than Jesse. Not to say he will do a great job, but he'll do that role better than Jesse, imo.
    Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

  9. #33
    scott names the planets stellation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    peaches eaten, trousers rolled
    Posts
    9,700
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Triple B View Post
    Personally I think Pyke is much better equipped to run with Ryder than Jesse. Not to say he will do a great job, but he'll do that role better than Jesse, imo.
    I agree, Pyke would be fine to run with Ryder. My biggest concern with Pyke over White if it comes to that is, assuming he isn't a sub (obviously they may go with the idea again), we'd be playing 2 ruckmen that don't really have a solid second position to play. Mummy can get it around the ground (didn't really against Melbourne), but that only is really when running in the ruck.
    I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
    We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

  10. #34
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,199
    Quote Originally Posted by On-Baller View Post
    My best guess is Pyke wont play,i think Mummy will ruck when Hille rucks and White when Ryder does,yes we loose out in the ruck but Jesse has the pace to go with Ryder around the ground i dont think Pyke does,Bird will be the sub imo.
    ??? Pyke is lightening, sure he didn't get to show it in the GF slippery dip the other year, but I think his tank as well would be competitive with Jesse and he is quicker, and dare I say it a better set of hands marking wise.... Oh yeah I went there.

  11. #35
    McVeigh for Brownlow RogueSwan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coffs Harbour - home of Swans summer camp
    Posts
    4,592
    Quote Originally Posted by stellation View Post
    ... we'd be playing 2 ruckmen that don't really have a solid second position to play. Mummy can get it around the ground (didn't really against Melbourne), but that only is really when running in the ruck.
    Mummy's second role can be tagging Watson and letting him know that every time he gets the ball Mummy will be the one tackling him.
    "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

  12. #36
    Ego alta, ergo ictus Ruck'n'Roll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Over here!
    Posts
    3,875
    I really hope they don't repeat the ruckman=sub thing again, but I too fear they may. And if they do play Mummy & Pike I suspect they'll drop Jesse, for fear of being top heavy.

    But I think there may be another either all question.

    If, as seems possible, Bird will be included to try to reverse the contested footy problem.
    Is that a solution?
    They pulled Jude out of the midfield partly because the Demons made him look VERY slow, could that have adversely affect our ability in tight?
    And is Craig a whole lot quicker than Jude? Will either of them he be able to keep up with Essendon's speedsters?
    Can we afford to include the pair of them?
    Loose translation from the Latin is - I am tall, so I hit out.

Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO