Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 13 to 14 of 14

Thread: Do the Cats get a better deal than other sides from the umpies

  1. #13
    Veterans List
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Crowland :-(
    Posts
    6,098
    Not quite on theme but how often do they pay a free when two guys are puching and grappling for an incoming bal and the weaker one looses his feet. Whilstle - free kick to the weakie.

    Gives me the absolute @@@@s regardless of which team it is.

    Some of the current rules are crap and I feel for the umpires having to interpret them but a bit less whistle woukld be good.

    And don't get me started on ruck infringements - sheesh - I thought this was a mans game?
    Last edited by goswannie14; 15th June 2011 at 07:13 AM. Reason: swear filter avoidance

  2. #14
    Formerly 'BBB' Triple B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    6,999
    Quote Originally Posted by Bas View Post
    Shame, would have been a great finale if he had been awarded a penalty and then kicked the goal.
    It would have been a better finale if he had been awarded a 'free' and kicked a point...

    Quote Originally Posted by Bas View Post
    Selwood offered 4 weeks for his contact on Guerra. Three weeks with a guilty plea. High Contact - 3, Late contact - 3 and somethging else - 2

    So umpires maybe NOT that nice to Cats.
    Nothing to do with the umps, they didn't even award a free kick for the incident...
    Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO