Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 32

Thread: All Australian squad

  1. #13
    It's Goodes to cheer!! ScottH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Master of the house, keeper of the zoo
    Posts
    23,665
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Damien View Post
    Mumford should be in the squad, I wouldn't have in the final team but should be in the squad.
    Mumford has only been in extraordinary form in the last month.
    Not surprised there. Hard to beat Cox, anytime.

  2. #14
    On the Rookie List Donners's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    1,061
    I hoped that was our J Kennedy for a moment.

    Goodes, Richards and Mummy were the only ones reasonably in contention, IMO. Jude started off well, but fell away for a few months.

  3. #15

    no AA for mumford?

    Gees, mummy very stiff to not get an all australian nomination in my opinion...

  4. #16
    I reckon.

  5. #17
    Missed 5 games. Not many players are gonna get in on the back of only 17 games. With that in mind, if any ruckman is unlucky to miss out on the squad it's Leuenberger IMO.

    Mummy's 17 games were great, but if you miss 5 games in a 22 game season you're gonna struggle to make the AA.

  6. #18
    Support Staff Old Royboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Lake Tabourie
    Posts
    879
    I'm happy with that. As in 2005, a champion team will beat a team of champions every day.
    Pay peanuts get monkeys

  7. #19
    Veterans List Bas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Gosford - Central Coast
    Posts
    4,457
    Quote Originally Posted by Old Royboy View Post
    I'm happy with that. As in 2005, a champion team will beat a team of champions every day.
    So your money is on West Coast? Not this year for the Swans but hopefully next year.
    In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.

  8. #20
    leuenberger missed out? thats ridiculous he has been one of the best ruckman this year in a struggling brissy side, given cox past thats one of the main factors hes in the team

  9. #21
    Agree with above comments if mummy plays 22-23 games he's in for sure 17 makes it hard

  10. #22
    Lucky "Australia" doesn't actually play anyone ... if Goodesy was unavailable we would get smashed!

  11. #23
    Veterans List Big Al's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    7,007
    4 Norf players v 1 Swan player.

    Good luck in the finals North. With that many in the AA you should do well. Oh wait....

    Seriously though Goodes and Teddy are the only Swans I'd have in. As Ugg said Mummy has been great the last month or so but had a slow start to the year and 5 weeks out.
    ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

    Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

  12. #24
    Regular in the Side nomae's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    sydney
    Posts
    523
    Quote Originally Posted by S120 View Post
    Not many players are gonna get in on the back of only 17 games.

    Mummy's 17 games were great, but if you miss 5 games in a 22 game season you're gonna struggle to make the AA.
    Except if you're Joel Selwood.

    @@@@ing so sick of that ducking @@@@. (And yes, I did mean ducking)

    To his credit he is a talented player but the amount of high free kicks he gets is ridiculous, yet Jude (who missed what, two or three games this year?), who goes at the footy because he wants to earn it, not draw free kicks, still doesn't get a look in.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO