Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567
Results 73 to 75 of 75

Thread: Bankstown: Swans or GWS?

  1. #73
    Council pays for regular remedial work to Kelso - it has had it's issues over the years due to the ongoing subsidence.

    Currently it is like a bowling green and has been for 18 months ... no cricket pitch and no other traffic helps!

    The only use it gets now is from the model airplane enthusiasts and the occasional local walking the dog.

    Just another embarrassment to the AFL.

  2. #74
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    quakers hill
    Posts
    1,506
    Quote Originally Posted by unconfuseme View Post
    Council pays for regular remedial work to Kelso - it has had it's issues over the years due to the ongoing subsidence.

    Currently it is like a bowling green and has been for 18 months ... no cricket pitch and no other traffic helps!

    The only use it gets now is from the model airplane enthusiasts and the occasional local walking the dog.

    Just another embarrassment to the AFL.
    Actually we use it for preseason training and trials as well as an occasional wet weather facility due to Bankstown Council being slightly more progressive than Liverpool when it comes to ground closures.

  3. #75
    Bankstown Council has spent over $300,000 on the ground over the past 3 years. Installing lights capable of hosting night competition games, completely levelling and resurfacing the ground 2 years ago.
    They also installed a new fence and took in all the Junior club feedback.
    The AFL got all this benefit from having a Junior club occupy/lease the ground and facility for free!
    Now they are spending money smoozing Councillers to keep the ground for AFL.

    Doesn't that one make a lot of sense

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO