Page 8 of 14 FirstFirst ... 456789101112 ... LastLast
Results 85 to 96 of 167

Thread: Nick Malceski eyes move to Melbourne Demons

  1. #85
    Quote Originally Posted by Kelpie_X View Post
    We get Buddy to clean him up in the Granny with an elbow.
    very good

  2. #86
    Veterans List
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    11,142
    Quote Originally Posted by 09183305 View Post
    Hypothetical ... let's say Cosmic Wizard earns X dollars a year doing whatever his job is. Then CW is told he will only be able to work for 2-3 more years, after which his wage will likely drop. Another employer says "Wiz, we know you can only work another couple of years, we want to have you work for us & give you an extra 30% to do the same job."

    Wiz, would you quit for that? Might be worth, say, $100K for Mal & he can also factor in that he has already achieved the ultimate goal. If it was, say, $100K, that'd school a couple of kids for their entire education, great deposit on an investment property etc

    (NB: $100K was a made up figure)
    Depends on what school they go to. Government school maybe the $100K would cover.

  3. #87
    Out : N. Malceski In : G. Rohan ???
    I was wrong about Gerard and his hair.


  4. #88
    This might seem like an odd choice but if Malceski goes I think I'd like to see Jetta be given a go across half back. He has great speed and composure and his kicking ability is superb.

  5. #89
    pr. dim-melb; m not f
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Central Coast NSW, Costa Lantana
    Posts
    6,889
    Quote Originally Posted by Ampersand View Post
    This might seem like an odd choice but if Malceski goes I think I'd like to see Jetta be given a go across half back. He has great speed and composure and his kicking ability is superb.
    I think this has real merit, and I would expect that whether it's Jetts, Rohan or Zak they will increasingly be rotated through the middle and backline.
    He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

  6. #90
    Fatal error: Allowed memo undy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Lane Cove
    Posts
    1,231
    Quote Originally Posted by dimelb View Post

    I think this has real merit, and I would expect that whether it's Jetts, Rohan or Zak they will increasingly be rotated through the middle and backline.
    Don't underestimate what Jetta is already providing to the team. He is apparently 2nd in the AFL for metres gain outside the D50. Replacing that would take a very useful player.
    Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.

  7. #91
    Quote Originally Posted by Ampersand View Post
    This might seem like an odd choice but if Malceski goes I think I'd like to see Jetta be given a go across half back. He has great speed and composure and his kicking ability is superb.
    it is funny but i have been mulling over the same idea as Mal plays more the 50% on the wing anyway and Mal only arm grabs like Jetts anyway re defence

    just joking both have improved their defensive pressure
    "be tough, only when it gets tough"


  8. #92
    Jetta's tackle pressure is excellent but he would have to work on his spoiling and contested marking. But can you imagine having the speed of Rohan and Jetta (replacing Mal and Shaw) running off half back and delivering to Tippett and Buddy? Could be a devastating combo.

  9. #93
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    1,548
    Surely not Mike and The Birdman too? Say it ain't so could we lose all three?
    No Cookies | Fox Sports News, Live Sport, Sports | Fox Sports

  10. #94
    Sounds like pure speculation to me. Plus assume we lose one, that would free up money to entice the other two.
    Seriously doubt we would lose all three.
    Chillin' with the strange Quarks

  11. #95
    Happy and I know it
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    1,246
    At least they can't use the "going home to Victoria" rubbish for Bird and Pyke.
    All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. - Edmund Burke

  12. #96
    Suspended by the MRP
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,802
    Quote Originally Posted by Untamed Snark View Post
    Sounds like pure speculation to me. Plus assume we lose one, that would free up money to entice the other two.
    Seriously doubt we would lose all three.
    Pyke in my opinion would be the one you would not want to lose. There is depth on the half back line to replace Mal (Towers, Rohan, Jones). There is midfield depth to replace Bird (Mitchell if he decides to stay, Lloyd and Heeney. There are also strong midfield performers in the reserves like Hewitt and Robinson who would relish an opportunity.

    Ruck is the big concern, so it would be deviating to lose Pyke. We need he and Tom D around in 2015 to buffer the development of Naismith and Toby N. They should both be ready to commence regular, solid senior football in 2016. The sticking point could be that Pyke wants two years, but the club will only offer year by year.

Page 8 of 14 FirstFirst ... 456789101112 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO