Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Mathew Stokes Letter

  1. #1
    Veterans List Ludwig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Chiang Mai
    Posts
    9,310

    Mathew Stokes Letter

    Congratulations to the AFL for publishing Mathew Stokes' open letter on the AFL website on a matter that is not directly football related.

    Dear Prime Minister: Stokes' open letter to Tony Abbott - AFL.com.au

    Firstly, it is pleasing to see a popular and well respected indigenous player from another club take some of the heat off of our Adam Goodes, who has copped the bulk of the racist comments from some parts of the football community. Most players don't want to go public about such things. But if a few more high profile indigenous players could step up it might go a long way to improving awareness of the issues facing our indigenous communities.

    It's been a matter high on the public agenda of the AFL, and they did take some criticism, particularly from Mark Robinson, for passing over Michael Long for the AFL Commission. My feeling at the time was that it was probably more to do with keeping Chris Langford on the Commission ahead of the Academies bidding system decision than anything to do with racism, yet an opportunity was missed.

    It will be interesting to see if any other indigenous players come out in support of Stokes as well as the reaction from the footy journalists.

  2. #2
    pr. dim-melb; m not f
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Central Coast NSW, Costa Lantana
    Posts
    6,889
    It's a good letter - straightforward, no overstatement or hostility, simple regret at such a mistake.
    The response will be interesting.
    He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

  3. #3
    McVeigh for Brownlow Site Admin RogueSwan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Coffs Harbour - home of Swans summer camp
    Posts
    4,587
    Quote Originally Posted by dimelb View Post
    It's a good letter - straightforward, no overstatement or hostility, simple regret at such a mistake.
    The response will be interesting...
    ...and probably a long time coming.
    "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

  4. #4
    Absolutely agree, but this belongs in the general footy thread.
    Today's a draft of your epitaph

  5. #5
    On the Rookie List tasmania60's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    i a house
    Posts
    276
    Lets be honest ,nothing done swept under the carpet ?

  6. #6
    Stokes surprises a few people. Hes quite a good writer. I believe he even writes his own songs.

    That said, I believe that Tony Abbott and Warren Mundine (the only intelligent Mundine) were correct. If you (Aboriginal, Caucasian, Martian, whatever) live in an area where there is no hope of gaining employment you should lose your unemployment benefits. This also applies to people who want work in a particular sector and aren't willing to move interstate. This country has too many people on welfare as it is. Why should the taxpayer have to pay someone who isn't willing to go to where the work is?

    I know that many of you will disagree with this but please respond without the personal abuse.
    Last edited by S.S. Bleeder; 28th March 2015 at 09:49 AM.

  7. #7
    pr. dim-melb; m not f
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Central Coast NSW, Costa Lantana
    Posts
    6,889
    Quote Originally Posted by S.S. Bleeder View Post
    Stokes surprises a few people. Hes quite a good writer. I believe he even writes his own songs.

    That said, I believe that Tony Abbott and Warren Mundine (the only intelligent Mundine) were correct. If you (Aboriginal, Caucasian, Martian, whatever) live in an area where there is no hope of gaining employment you should lose your unemployment benefits. This also applies to people who want work in a particular sector and aren't willing to move interstate. This country has too many people on welfare as it is. Why should the taxpayer have to pay someone who isn't willing to go to where the work is?

    I know that many of you will disagree with this but please respond without the personal abuse.
    I take your point that it is a mistake to pay welfare to people who make no effort to find work, but I think there are genuine cultural issues here that should be taken into account. As far as I'm aware, Aboriginal people themselves coined the derogatory term "sit-down money" to describe welfare.

    Perhaps we need to find ways to bridge the gap between industrial and post-industrial life on one hand and indigenous attachment to and use of the land on the other. If people value both worlds, surely they can work out ways for people to live in both, albeit at different times. Can mainstream Australia and outback indigenous society find enough flexibility to allow both identities? Even city slickers like me can have a sense that our inland is important for other reasons than being dug up and sold to the highest bidder. And no, I'm not simply dumping on the mining industry, which is also a necessity if we want the benefits of a materially advanced society. That's the dilemma.
    He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO