At first, I was very happy that we stuffed up Hawthorn over the Carslile deal.
NOW... geez I wish we'd left it alone and allowed that trainwreck to barrel through the poos and wees.
Oh, the value of hindsight.
At first, I was very happy that we stuffed up Hawthorn over the Carslile deal.
NOW... geez I wish we'd left it alone and allowed that trainwreck to barrel through the poos and wees.
Oh, the value of hindsight.
Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.
The trouble is that he can play so he may have strengthened them rather than brought them down. I feel strangely sad for the Saints though.Originally Posted by AnnieH
At first, I was very happy that we stuffed up Hawthorn over the Carslile deal.
NOW... geez I wish we'd left it alone and allowed that trainwreck to barrel through the poos and wees.
Oh, the value of hindsight.
Yes, but THEY would have had to have dealt with the controversy... not the ainters.
Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.
Think you answered your own questions ! Good results so far and the plan to get Mills & Dunkley is on track. Considering our restrictions probably the best we have hoped for is on track.
Treloar, Hampton, Sumner, Plowman, Lamb, Philips, Townsend out, Simpson and SJ in. That makes net 5 down. Does that mean they have another 5 to delist?
+Bugg
So they'll have to cut 4 if they want to use all 10 picks.
Addison is out of contract and Golds seems to be the other option but in contract.
There are no obvious candidates to be cut, and even the most probable are probably contracted players. I doesn't make sense that the Giants would trade down for these picks knowing the situation.
It would make more sense to trade down to next year's picks which could be used to make up a deficit. But the Swans actually traded a next year 4th rounder to acquire pick 69 this year which looks as though it will not be used if the pick limitation is correct. It appeared that the intent was to add a bit of cushion to acquire Dunkley, but why so few points and at the expense of delisting a player in order to use it.
Either the pick number restrictions are different this year or the strategy of trading down by the Swans, Giants and Lions is badly mistaken.
Armstrong got delisted, didn't he?
Did Lamb get another gig somewhere?
Sad to see ex-swans bow out.
Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.
Yes for armstrong,
He wrote a good article about it, google:
"AFL football's over, but its lessons remain ..."
Lamb plays on:
http://www.carltonfc.com.au/news/201...-know-jed-lamb
Thanks MM.
Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.
love Colin !!!!!
O'Riordan feeling at home - sydneyswans.com.au
no bars held
no holds barred
"be tough, only when it gets tough"
Very impressive. I like his respect for the number and that he is proud to be following in Mike Pyke's footsteps. His attitude suggests that he is going to give his AFL opportunity his best shot, and has a maturity that will help him deal with homesickness issues. Hopefully in time it will be a matter of 'move over Tighe'.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks