Page 1 of 13 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 145

Thread: Changes for Rnd 5 V West Coast

  1. #1
    Veterans List aardvark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Down South
    Posts
    4,979

    Changes for Rnd 5 V West Coast

    Outs. Nankervis
    Ins. Sinclair?

    I hope Papley gets another chance although I don't think there is room for him and Benny in the same team.
    I'd drop Richards if we had anyone to replace him with.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by aardvark View Post
    Outs. Nankervis
    Ins. Sinclair?

    I hope Papley gets another chance although I don't think there is room for him and Benny in the same team.
    I'd drop Richards if we had anyone to replace him with.
    Benny was very good I thought. Would you drop him and keep Papley?

  3. #3
    Regular in the Side
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    844
    Quote Originally Posted by aardvark View Post
    Outs. Nankervis
    Ins. Sinclair?

    I hope Papley gets another chance although I don't think there is room for him and Benny in the same team.
    I'd drop Richards if we had anyone to replace him with.
    Yep, Teddy was a step behind tonight.

    It was a new experience for Papley. He'll learn from it. Who comes in for him? Not Jack. Rose quieter today. Reckon Rohan more a threat to McGlynn.

    Nankervis was good tonight. Has the courage and smarts.

  4. #4
    Veterans List aardvark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Down South
    Posts
    4,979
    Quote Originally Posted by Melbourne_Blood View Post
    Benny was very good I thought. Would you drop him and keep Papley?
    Probably not. It will be interesting to see what happens there.

  5. #5
    Can't see Richard getting better/returning to old form

  6. #6
    On the Rookie List jetts32's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    200
    Keep Papley and Mcglynn in the same team. Both have great defensive pressure in the forward line but Benny also pinch hits in the midfield. So to keep Papley in the forward line is a good idea I think.

    OUT: Nankervis, Robinson
    In: Sinclair, Jones

    I did like Nankervis tonight, great follow up work and tackles, couple of good grabs but Sinclair being out tonight could've really made the difference.

  7. #7
    Regular in the Side
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    944
    Quote Originally Posted by Melbourne_Blood View Post
    Benny was very good I thought. Would you drop him and keep Papley?
    9 possessions.

    Sent from my SM-T805Y using Tapatalk
    We have them where we want them, everything is going according to plan!

  8. #8
    Ins

    Sinclair if ready
    Jones
    Hewitt

    Out

    Nankervis
    Towers
    Papley

    Notes

    Papley will be starting to fatigue. Give him modified game time in the reserves.

    Love to see Mills spend time forward with Heeney. Great mark and kick.

    McVeigh could spend time forward to accommodate Jones.

  9. #9
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Crowland :-(
    Posts
    3,055
    Can't believe it that no one has mentioned Towers as an out, was a weak link tonight

  10. #10
    Wow, we lost a game that could have gone either way and people want to make 3 changes?

    I agree Ted, Papley and Towers had an off night, but all 3 have played good games this year.

    My only change would be Sinclair for Nankervis, although I thought Toby played well

  11. #11
    Senior Player ernie koala's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    northern beaches
    Posts
    3,086
    OUT : Towers ... He plays like a startled hare.
    Nankervis...played really well last night and will get more opportunities no doubt

    IN : Rose ... Much more of a threat, always busy.
    Sinclair... Hopefully he's fit to take on his old side. He brings mobility and he's a forward 50 threat.
    Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

  12. #12
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Sydney South
    Posts
    1,193
    I agree that nankervis played his part but I thought that sinclairs absence was the difference between us winning and losing that game. Papley has been crumbing brilliantly off Sinclair and that was largely responsible for papleys quiet night. Towers was average I agree. I think he makes way for Reid when he returns but not yet. Towers has also played better when Sinclair was in the team.

    My changes:
    IN: Sinclair
    OUT: Nankervis

    If Kieren jack needs a rest after his head knocks then I would play hewett for him. I would really like to get hewett back into the team as his disposal efficiency and silky skills across half back and midfield were a noticeable benefit in the first two games

Page 1 of 13 1234511 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO