There are three lines of thinking in this thread:
- We won. Therefore everyone in the team played well regardless of stats or stats rolled up into fantasy point summary.
- We won because of leadership, despite this being difficult to measure, and leadership is attributed on a sliding scale of oldest to youngest, or favorite to least favorite to suit your point of view.
- Direct player analysis irrespective of the result.
For example, Dean Towers is a mature age player, experienced, captain of the 2's, got a lot of the ball, came into the side as we had our first win. Surely his "leadership" index must be higher than McVeigh for this game? lol.
Bookmarks