I agree the Giants were poor yesterday, but we were made to look very ordinary in the QF last year before regrouping and making our way to the Grand Final. Next week they will host either Port or West Coast at Spotless and they're capable of beating either.
They do need to do something about that forward line, though. It's looking very impotent.
Their ball movement into the forward line was appalling.Originally Posted by liz
Something's crook in western Sydney. This is a mere shadow of the team that played last year's finals.
This was discussed on Melbourne radio yesterday morning. As one commentator pointed out, GWS is full of guys who were absolute stars at junior levels and were treated accordingly. It was pointed out that they don't have enough players with "grunt." Certainly looked that way last night.
I think the AFL pulling back on salary cap extensions for Northern clubs is part of the problem. Gill was even boasting of it on one of the footy shows.They have no depth. That Stevie j is being seriously considered, shows how poor after the top 20 they are. It has crippled them before they have established themselves. Swans are well established and can ride it out. Brisbane, GC and GWS are still to vulnerable. Melbourne centric AFL have really stuffed up the north again.
Cameron's injury could be a blessing in disguise for the Giants. I'm surprised they stuck with all 3 of Patton/Cameron/Lobb and then brought in Himmelberg (194cm) as well. They've gone way too tall, and there's no pressure on the opposition defenders once the ball hits the ground.
Still can't believe the bogans dropped Stevie J... their most experienced finals playing player.
Idiots.
Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.
Bring Stevie J back in - I think that he could have kept them at level pegging last night over the first part of the game when they had the ball in their attacking 50 but looked incapable.
Are we there yet ?
Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.
Totally agree. I'd drop mummy and play lobb in ruck too.
Patton is the laziest player I've ever seen.
I know they had injuries but if you were a list manager I think you'd describe their list as anything but fine.
Given they have no concessions now and the benefits of frontloading the contracts of Scully, Davis Shaw and Ward are wearing off I think they have a huge % of their salary cap invested in a small number of admittedly elite players - Shiel, Coniglio, Cameron, Patton, Lobb, Whitfield and Kelly would all be on huge coin. And those kids have never had to fight for anything in their life and fall over when challenged. The only players in that club that have any character, and they have it in spades, are the trio of Davis Scully and Ward who were inspired signings. But when they leave in 2-3 years you look and wonder where the next bunch of leaders are. I don't see any - I see a bunch of teenage millionaires who just cannot wait to explore free agency when the time comes to maximise their career earnings.
Their injury list is not that deep now. Their only injuries right now are Kennedy, Griffin and Buntine so you cannot tell me that they would have made much of a difference.
They have only got two second rounders in this years draft so their improvement needs to come from within - I imagine Taranto, Setterfield and Perryman will get a run next year but they are no guarantees to be stars. And as I pointed out you have Stevie J retiring and Mumford and Shaw looking cooked. Recruiting Deledio looks like a ridiculous decision and Griffin is 32 next year so also close to the end too.
Now, if they lose Kelly and/or Smith their list starts to look even thinner and with free agency starting to beckon the only reason they will stay, winning premierships, is starting to fade too.
It's bizarre that experts as recently as a couple of months ago were talking about betting GWS v the field. Clearly they are not a crap team overnight but if they go out in straight sets I think the AFL would be feeling a bit nervous.
Until now GWS have had a rails run. Plenty of draft one picks so it didn't matter if they missed with a few. Surplus players to trade out for more first round draft picks. Well that cycle is over now. GWS need to develop and improve players like any other club. Like we do with a back six that came from the rookie list along with latter draft picks who we develop over years (Lloyd, Newman, Towers).
I'm not sure that GWS have the skillset or desire to do that, to knuckle down for the long haul now if things don't go to their business plan with a flag falling into their lap in years 5,6 or 7 as they were told by all and sundry would happen. I don't know if the Eastern Suburbs corporate types and ignoramuses that populate the corporate box on match day will hang around when the fun wears off. And will the players, who all seem to have taken the bait that a flag this year was a fait accompli, be able to resist the lure back home on more money to a proper football club where they don't feel like they are in the circus. And I sure don't think a lot of the window lickers in the crowd will keep on returning if they start falling down the ladder.
Don't be fooled by the Victorian obsession that early draft picks are the greatest things ever.
Most of the finalists this year don't have many. Most of the strugglers have heaps.
What an entertaining narrative. What's a 'window licker'?
Reminds me of a mates sometime girlfriend who drove him mad so he changed the locks, so she became known as the (window) 'Cat Scratcher '.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks