Page 1 of 23 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 296

Thread: New Competition Structure for 2018

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    New Competition Structure for 2018

    Lots of speculation about the structure for next year, any clues?

  2. #2
    From what i have been told,
    Going back to a similar structure to when SFA & SFL existed.

    SFL or prems, will be current prems with possible 10th team being Camden.

    SFA or Div 1?,Magic,Parra,Balmain,Sth Power,Mac Uni, Penrith etc

  3. #3
    Almost Football Legend
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Local footy venues
    Posts
    2,925
    I don't think it's a done deal yet, and it may not happen.

    But the general principle is that seniors and reserves will always play together. At one stage they were floating the idea of having seniors, reserves & under 19s together for Prems, but where would that leave UTS?
    Not sure how that would affect thirds, fourths etc. Plenty of clubs are fielding more than two open-age teams these days, not just the university clubs but clubs like North Shore & Pennant Hills; which is a good thing. But standards of thirds, fourths, fifths etc vary wildly from club to club; and whether a new model would create suitable divisions for them to play in remains to be seen.

    Follow me on Twitter - @tealfooty

  4. #4
    Warming the Bench
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Turramurra, NSW
    Posts
    326
    Quote Originally Posted by Norris Lurker View Post
    I don't think it's a done deal yet, and it may not happen.

    But the general principle is that seniors and reserves will always play together. At one stage they were floating the idea of having seniors, reserves & under 19s together for Prems, but where would that leave UTS?
    Not sure how that would affect thirds, fourths etc. Plenty of clubs are fielding more than two open-age teams these days, not just the university clubs but clubs like North Shore & Pennant Hills; which is a good thing. But standards of thirds, fourths, fifths etc vary wildly from club to club; and whether a new model would create suitable divisions for them to play in remains to be seen.
    Just give the 19s a bye when you draw uts???

  5. #5
    Very interested to see what it does for u19s and third senior sides.

  6. #6
    "Likely" for 2018 is the word. Old model, new name. Premier A ( Current PD teams + looking for another from "South West Sydney Area".). Premier B. All other clubs invited to join but not compulsory. Each comp will require a reserves side. Then it will be Div 1, 2 etc below that allowing PD teams and clubs that dont wish to enter Premier B. Also looking at 3 divisions in womens (PD, PD Reserves and Div 1)19's still to be determined. In essence, not the worst idea but can see blowouts in the Reserves competitions. Premier A will have the three Div 1 ladder leaders in two's and they have 5 of the 6 top placed Div 2 sides.

    Within a few seasons, the aim is to have PD, PD Reserves, PD Women's and PD 19's. Divisionalisation was a success but has been cruelled in recent years with teams "convincing" the league to stay in lower divisions with laughable excuses and by-law changes suiting the stronger clubs as well as the inevitable rorting.

    The new system doesn't seem to allow for much equalisation, especially in the Women's/19's with clubs that have done the hard yards.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by ShortHalfHead View Post
    "Likely" for 2018 is the word. Old model, new name. Premier A ( Current PD teams + looking for another from "South West Sydney Area".). Premier B. All other clubs invited to join but not compulsory. Each comp will require a reserves side. Then it will be Div 1, 2 etc below that allowing PD teams and clubs that dont wish to enter Premier B. Also looking at 3 divisions in womens (PD, PD Reserves and Div 1)19's still to be determined. In essence, not the worst idea but can see blowouts in the Reserves competitions. Premier A will have the three Div 1 ladder leaders in two's and they have 5 of the 6 top placed Div 2 sides.

    Within a few seasons, the aim is to have PD, PD Reserves, PD Women's and PD 19's. Divisionalisation was a success but has been cruelled in recent years with teams "convincing" the league to stay in lower divisions with laughable excuses and by-law changes suiting the stronger clubs as well as the inevitable rorting.

    The new system doesn't seem to allow for much equalisation, especially in the Women's/19's with clubs that have done the hard yards.
    Back to the future, I think that divisionalisation has served its purpose and a hybrid model that eventually looks towards club based comps along the lines of the VAFA is probably the best way forward.

    I'd throw promotion and relegation as well.

  8. #8
    The chance for Most Clubs to Play their Senior teams together or have at least two Grouped together every week could only be a positive. Obviously the 19's would take some tinkering depending on team nominations but going off the current divisions teams are playing in I think its worth a go Potential Comp Structure.pdf

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Nuttsy View Post
    The chance for Most Clubs to Play their Senior teams together or have at least two Grouped together every week could only be a positive. Obviously the 19's would take some tinkering depending on team nominations but going off the current divisions teams are playing in I think its worth a go Potential Comp Structure.pdf
    Without looking at every team current ladder position I reckon you have nailed the format.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Nuttsy View Post
    The chance for Most Clubs to Play their Senior teams together or have at least two Grouped together every week could only be a positive. Obviously the 19's would take some tinkering depending on team nominations but going off the current divisions teams are playing in I think its worth a go Potential Comp Structure.pdf
    From what I am hearing it is a done deal along the lines of Nuttsy's outline attached.

  11. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by Pmcc2911 View Post
    From what I am hearing it is a done deal along the lines of Nuttsy's outline attached.
    My understanding was that no PD clubs would be in the 2nd tier competition. If they were, there would be little difference as the legal rorting would surely continue

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Pmcc2911 View Post
    Without looking at every team current ladder position I reckon you have nailed the format.
    Sure, if you're only concerned with the Prems structure... there would be some seriously lopsided comps in pretty much every other grade..

Page 1 of 23 1234511 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO