It's not a pissing contest and you obviously didn't see the smilie face at the end of that line.
Maybe I should have use the tongue smilie. Semantics.
Anyway, your statement above only holds water if your contention right now is that you personally expect Hanners to get back to AA form.
You'd be the only one here, and kudos to you if that is actually what you think and it happens.
In the other hand, if that is just a random statement based on some remote possibility that he can get AA form back, then it's irrelevant as you could say that about Rohan, and any other player we traded.
I could say right now "if Rohan develops AA form or wins the Saints B&F then it was incompetent list management.
Or "if Towers is drafted by some team and plays 15+ games next season and is an instant mark down for their best 22 week in week out than that was incompetent list management by the Swans.
So your statement is true, and so are my statements.
But mine are irrelevant because it's just me purely speculating.
So what I'm getting at, is whether you are happy to lose Hanners and what you think would have been a fairer deal (single pick trade)
Bookmarks