Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456
Results 61 to 67 of 67

Thread: Proposed Rule Changes......warranted or complete BS?

  1. #61
    Quote Originally Posted by Bloods05 View Post
    Planes and boats and trains....
    Email. Skype. FaceTime. A letter. Phone call. 2 cans and a really long piece of tight string.

    You’re right. Not that hard to convey the information

  2. #62
    I wonder whether the one-player-starts-in-the -goal-square rule mightn't see some tactical options. Buddy or Haywood?

  3. #63
    Quote Originally Posted by sprite View Post
    The AFL send umpires around the clubs to train with and officiate in practice matches. They need to have match practice as well, it gives them an opportunity to trial the rules, explain how they are to be interpreted.
    That's great. Do we get as much time as those clubs who have umps located in same city?

  4. #64
    Carpe Noctem CureTheSane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Knoxfield, Victoria
    Posts
    4,946
    Quote Originally Posted by barry View Post
    That's great. Do we get as much time as those clubs who have umps located in same city?
    Really, the club should be flying a bunch of them up in conjunction with GWS to spend a week in Sydney going through everything that needs clarification.
    This is a better deal than the Vic clubs as they'd have them exclusively, complete attention.
    The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.

  5. #65
    Quote Originally Posted by barry View Post
    That's great. Do we get as much time as those clubs who have umps located in same city?
    Probably could if we wanted, yeah.

  6. #66
    Quote Originally Posted by ScottH View Post
    TOO MANY rule changes in one go, me thinks.

    How quickly will they be able to monitor the 6-6-6 rule?

    The hands in the back rule is still very open to interpretation.
    Will still see a lot of wrong decisions paid either way.
    easy to get around the 666 rule, if you want to stack your defense - you play the two players you want to drop back as wingers. If you look at the new rule , you are allowed to patrol the whole side of the square to start so you drop the winger to the back of the square and you get your half forward flankers to run come in to cover the opposition winger if that person doesn't go with your winger

  7. #67
    Will Beelzebub appear in the goal square on the first incarnation of the 666 rule?
    He of cloven hoof.

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO