I've also been wondering about third party deals for a while. As in, how could Hawthorn win premierships, and still successfully lure anyone that they targeted (even if they got rid of aging stars)? Or how can Geelong fit Dangerfield, Ablett and Selwood under their salary cap? Or how could Richmond sign Lynch, when they already have Rance, Riewoldt, Martin and Cotchin?
So, anyway, I have tried Googling information on what clubs are spending and on who they're spending it, but it seems that there's pretty well nothing there. Largely the search results are: Chris Judd scandal, a bit about the AFL knocking back a proposed Ablett payment and some technical stuff about what third party payments are. As far as I can tell, there's nothing about individual deals, or even how much each club spends? Which tends to make me suspicious.
Interesting thoughts about Sinclair. He was quite good in 2018, but fell away a bit this year. He was still okay. The problem with Sinclair is we just lose too much in the ruck which isn't sufficiently offset by his work around the ground, as good as it is for a ruckman. When Franklin played, we managed well enough using Reid or Aliir as backups. If Naismith is fit, Sinclair looks out of a job, even without Daniher. He would be our backup ruckman, if Naismith is injured, or could fill a forward/ruck role if we are down on tall forwards.
I'm sympathetic to your views about choosing heart over talent. I would have preferred the whole Daniher thing never happened and we just continued on rebuilding the way we were going. I was enjoying seeing our drafted players develop, the change in game style to suit the new talent coming through, and was looking forward to a rebound next year. But now with a 'savior' being helicoptered in, it's a whole different vision. So far, I don't like, but I'll try to stay open minded.
Or we could see if there is interest elsewhere , the kangas have pick 8 and have expressed an interest . They aren’t swimming in quality small forwards and there is the Shaw connection. Papleys manager has already said he will go to any Melbourne club , he’s just prefer Carlton. Heck, let’s get the Dees involved ! Pick 3 for paps and pick 25 ! Too optimistic ?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I like the Norf idea.
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Unfortunately for us in this case the difference of one pick is significant. What GWS are trying to do is get pick 4 from the Crows so that Adelaide can’t use it, as expected, to bid on Tom Green.
If the Giants get their hands on pick 4 they can use it to pick someone else besides Green and still be able to match when the bid comes for Green. If they don’t trade and have to match Green they’ll have to use 12 and part of 18 to match. Looking at it this way they are basically getting pick 4 this year for their 2020 first rounder and losing whatever pick 18 would have been downgraded to when using to match Green.
All of this is dependent on Melbourne not bidding on Green at pick 3 though, something they can’t guarantee so it is a risk for GWS.
If GWS make the floated trade (Adelaide's Pick 4 for their 12 18 and 2020 1st), it would decimate their draft picks so hard that they would not be able to draft Green except with pick 4. Their picks are currently 12, 18, 40, 60, 80, 94. 80 and 94 have no draft value. If that trade was made, they would have 4, 40, 60 to match bids on Green, but then would be constrained in drafting Green at pick 4.
The key here is matching bids by Melbourne at pick 3 (2234 points). With 12 and 18 (2253 points), they can match pick 3 without difficulty (12 and 18 would become pick 38 worth 465 points). They would have pick 3 (matched), 38, 40, 65 etc. If they traded out and matched pick 3 with pick 4 (2034 points), pick 4 would become pick 54 (220 points). They would have pick 3 (matched), 39, 54, 65 etc. It's significantly worse, even before considering they are without their 2020 first-round pick as well.
In short, I do not see that trade happening.
Pick 4 is worth 219 fewer points than 12 and 18 combined. The trade would be fairer if it did not include the Giants' 2020 first-round pick and Adelaide would need to send a late pick with their pick 4, equivalent to pick 54 (220 points). A possible trade: Adelaide 4 and 40 to GWS. GWS 12, 18 and GWS's 2020 4th-round pick to Adelaide. However, I do not see such a trade happening. 12 and 18 is sufficient for matching bids on Green.
"Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi final
This is the most boring trade week EVAH!!!
Do we still have a team?
Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.
Yep kirky is coming out of retirement !!!
Lol
Bookmarks