Page 175 of 452 FirstFirst ... 75125165171172173174175176177178179185225275 ... LastLast
Results 2,089 to 2,100 of 5424

Thread: 2020 trading, drafting and list management: players and personnel

  1. #2089
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Close to the old Lake Oval
    Posts
    3,915
    Quote Originally Posted by rojo View Post
    Swans' 2020 Report Card on AFL website makes for interesting reading. I don't know who Cameron Noakes is but he gives us a D ratiing. One of the factors of influence being that we didn't improve our ladder position. He identifies as our big holes, our ruck situation (surprise), and suggests Geelong's Darcy Fort as someone we might look at. He thinks JD would be a risky move because of the injury history of both Bud and Reid (no surprise there either). He suggests Jeremy Cameron. The other hole - midfield. I don't think he has taken into consideration Campbell and Gulden on the horizon.
    Another hack Melbourne footy journo. Who cares.

  2. #2090
    Quote Originally Posted by stevoswan View Post
    That's a bit Bernard King don't you think?

    Paddy is a seriously good mark, too courageous (for his own good) and a pretty good kick. Playing with his brother, he would be more invested in the Swans than at any other club and being a second chance, he will grab it with all he's got. Yes he'll be cheap.....so why not? He's a number one draft pick!
    Yeah probably a touch over the top haha. I just don’t think I’ve ever witnessed much more than the odd good glimpse from him. Yes he’s not had a good consistent run at it that is true.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. #2091
    Veterans List Ludwig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Chiang Mai
    Posts
    9,310
    Quote Originally Posted by Blood Fever View Post
    Another hack Melbourne footy journo. Who cares.
    Cameron Noakes has a high proportion of articles about the Swans. I don't know if he's a hack or not, but he's not focused on Melbourne. He wrote this rather positive article on the Swans' midfield after the Hawthorn game victory, which was mostly about Ollie Florent.

    The new Blood in the guts: Meet Sydney's midfield future

  4. #2092
    I look back on our season with far more optimism than the journalist mentioned but I do recognise that we once again finished low on the ladder. Our rebuild started a few seasons back when we decided to offload Hanneberry and Rohan. Since then we have invested heavily in the draft and brought in a small number of fringe players from other clubs. The drafted players have begun to develop and we now have a nucleus of good youngsters that should form the basis of our next good side. However, we are not there yet, so we need to invest in the draft again. Hence, the two academy boys and utilising our first round pick to acquire a top youngster should be our priorities. Bringing in a ruckmen from elsewhere should be the other priority. I'm not convinced the timing is right to chase players like Daniher or Cameron.

  5. #2093
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Close to the old Lake Oval
    Posts
    3,915
    Quote Originally Posted by Ludwig View Post
    Cameron Noakes has a high proportion of articles about the Swans. I don't know if he's a hack or not, but he's not focused on Melbourne. He wrote this rather positive article on the Swans' midfield after the Hawthorn game victory, which was mostly about Ollie Florent.

    The new Blood in the guts: Meet Sydney's midfield future
    Fine. My point is that it is just one opinion, no better or worse than any of us here on RWO. Not sure why people put any significance or importance on it.

  6. #2094
    Veterans List
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Crowland :-(
    Posts
    6,116
    Cameron Noakes, some bloke they found in a dunny cubicle who can string more than three words together so he's now writing season review articles.

    Most of us on RWO know a lot more about our club and what we produced this year than Mr.Noakes, not worth the time to read.

    I'm just wondering who makes way next year for Buddy, Rampe, Heeney, pick 3, Campbell and Gulden?

  7. #2095
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Close to the old Lake Oval
    Posts
    3,915
    Quote Originally Posted by 707 View Post
    Cameron Noakes, some bloke they found in a dunny cubicle who can string more than three words together so he's now writing season review articles.

    Most of us on RWO know a lot more about our club and what we produced this year than Mr.Noakes, not worth the time to read.

    I'm just wondering who makes way next year for Buddy, Rampe, Heeney, pick 3, Campbell and Gulden?
    Interesting point. Not sure if all young guys will play a lot of games. One thing this year has given us is knowing that we have more depth than we thought. Fox, Bell, Wicks, Foote come to mind. Brand looked useful early. Hope I haven't put a hex on any of these guys and they get cut!

  8. #2096
    Quote Originally Posted by stevoswan View Post
    .....and you wonder why people have a go at you. Seriously Barry, you're your own worst enemy. I try to be subjective when assessing other peoples post's but will always call out madness when I see it. An F+.....seriously? That's what I would give our injury list.....which seems to have been forgotten by many when assessing our season.
    You really do get upset by different opinions.

    To quote Wikipedia
    "The 16th place finish was also the lowest in club history".

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Markwebbos View Post
    Why would GW$ want an ageing poor ruckman? .
    Because they are desperate, and have a history of it.

  9. #2097
    When considering this trade and draft period it is important to firstly understand our restrictions:

    1. We are (fortunately) committed to drafting Campbell and Gulden. Best case scenario is that they get bid on at picks 10 and 30. This would cost us ~ 1600pts with the discount.

    2. Assuming we use pick 3 in the draft and don’t trade it for later picks, we have 1259pts available to match those bids leaving a deficit of 341pts.

    As you can see, even in a good scenario where our academy lads are bid later than expected, we still don’t have enough points.

    The good news:
    * We get 3 high quality kids in a draft that is full of unknowns.

    * The points deficit comes off our 2nd round pick in 2021 rather than our 1st. Even better, if we don’t hold a 2nd round pick for 2021 it would come off our 3rd and 4th round picks.

    The bad news:
    * The 2021 draft is supposed to be a good one so trading out of this draft or losing points value could hurt.

    Conclusion:
    We don’t have much currency in terms of draft picks to pick up players people are suggesting. 2nd round 2021 is likely the best we can do.

    If you are hypothesising a trade, understand that you’ve got to give something to get something and we don’t have much to give.

  10. #2098
    Quote Originally Posted by stevoswan View Post
    .....and you wonder why people have a go at you. Seriously Barry, you're your own worst enemy. I try to be subjective when assessing other peoples post's but will always call out madness when I see it. An F+.....seriously? That's what I would give our injury list.....which seems to have been forgotten by many when assessing our season.
    Quote Originally Posted by barry View Post
    You really do get upset by different opinions.

    To quote Wikipedia
    "The 16th place finish was also the lowest in club history".
    There is no refuting that this year is the lowest we’ve ever finished, at 16th. But the thing about numbers, barry, is that it they can tell a very different story depending how you present them. A glass half empty pessimist would say that it’s the lowest we’ve finished in history and leave it at that.

    Dig a little deeper and you might reverse the ladder. Take into consideration that there are more teams now than at any time in history so finishing 16th isn’t as low as you can finish. How about we (equally irrefutably) accurately present the ultimate 2020 ladder position as we finished third last rather than simply 16th. When you look at it that way, we’ve finished 3rd last 13 times in our history (1985, 1984, 1979, 1957, 1955, 1954, 1949, 1948, 1940, 1928, 1921, 1901, 1899). So 10.6% of the time since the inception of the VFL/AFL the Swans have finished 3rd last.

    In fact, on 24.4% of occasions the Swans have finished 3rd last or lower since the inception of the VFL/AFL competition.

    A quarter of the time.

    So it’s not as though this season’s ultimate position is necessarily an aberration for our club’s history. Likely merely a disappointing divergence from the recent trends of success.

    Given our injury history this season & the uniqueness of the Covid compromised season, I prefer the glass half full view that we finished 2 places better than a couple of other teams this year and I feel that the Swans have a lot more upside for 2021 than a number of other teams who finished above us this season.
    Last edited by goswannies; 26th September 2020 at 07:26 PM.

  11. #2099
    Sure, and in those 24.4% I would have graded mostly 'F'. There are no participation medals in AFL.

  12. #2100
    Veterans List
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Castlemaine, Vic.
    Posts
    8,220
    Quote Originally Posted by barry View Post
    You really do get upset by different opinions.
    I respect that there will be different opinions and that I just won't agree with every one of them.

    So no, I actually get upset with ridiculous opinions......laced with pessimism.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO