Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789
Results 97 to 107 of 107

Thread: Our club: the Board, corporate structure and governance

  1. #97
    Quote Originally Posted by barry View Post
    They are the same thing. I've simplified it for there folks who aren't familiar with board structure.

    Tell me, in either case, what mickey O contributes?
    True, but your definition omitted the critical role of oversight of management. Monitoring kpi's is not the same thing. There is a lot more to oversight than this eg ensuring the organisation does not break any laws or lose its social contract, ensuring that the organisation does not trade while insolvent etc.

    In terms of Mickie O, it is important that board composition reflects contemporary Australia rather than consisting of a group of white, middle-aged males. This is especially important for sports given that fans come from a diversity of colours and creeds!

  2. #98
    Quote Originally Posted by Aprilbr View Post

    In terms of Mickie O, it is important that board composition reflects contemporary Australia rather than consisting of a group of white, middle-aged males. This is especially important for sports given that fans come from a diversity of colours and creeds!
    I'm all for diversity, but it has to benefit the swans, and I just dont see a strong correlation between the board roles and responsibility and what Mickey O can contribute. No offense to Mickey O, champion player, champion bloke.

    However, it doesnt hurt to have an ex-player on the board, and it doesnt hurt to have an aboriginal perspective on the board as about 11% of players in AFL are indigenous.
    But I dont think we need two ex-players on the board. Mickey O case is better if he replaced Leo Barry.

  3. #99
    Veterans List
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Castlemaine, Vic.
    Posts
    8,177
    Quote Originally Posted by barry View Post
    I'm all for diversity, but it has to benefit the swans, and I just dont see a strong correlation between the board roles and responsibility and what Mickey O can contribute. No offense to Mickey O, champion player, champion bloke.

    However, it doesnt hurt to have an ex-player on the board, and it doesnt hurt to have an aboriginal perspective on the board as about 11% of players in AFL are indigenous.
    But I dont think we need two ex-players on the board. Mickey O case is better if he replaced Leo Barry.
    Just because they're ex-footballers doesn't mean they can't contribute in a positive manner to our board.....times are changing, not just in cultural and gender diversity at board level but also 'diversity in style of governance' if you'd like to call it that.....I am.....and after all, it is a football club.

    It makes sense to have ex-players who have substantial corporate experience at club board level.....with their natural passion for club success and respect of club history, to me it's like an insurance policy against sometimes non-sensical and purely business based board decisions. I will admit, due to lifetime of experiences, I have an ongoing suspicion of purely business driven people....but I do realise not all are evil and self serving.

    So don't get me wrong, I have faith in the Swans board, they have done an exemplary job over the years and the occupants of it wouldn't be there without the due diligence of the club to ensure they align with our clubs excellent values and ethos.....but ex-players of this calibre, to me, are a huge and frankly comforting asset regarding our clubs future direction.

    If I've ranted a bit....I've had a few scotches tonight.
    Last edited by stevoswan; 28th May 2021 at 01:31 AM.

  4. #100
    Quote Originally Posted by stevoswan View Post
    Just because they're ex-footballers doesn't mean they can't contribute in a positive manner to our board.....times are changing, not just in cultural and gender diversity at board level but also 'diversity in style of governance' if you'd like to call it that.....I am.....and after all, it is a football club.

    It makes sense to have ex-players who have substantial corporate experience at club board level.....with their natural passion for club success and respect of club history, to me it's like an insurance policy against sometimes non-sensical and purely business based board decisions. I will admit, due to lifetime of experiences, I have an ongoing suspicion of purely business driven people....but I do realise not all are evil and self serving.

    So don't get me wrong, I have faith in the Swans board, they have done an exemplary job over the years and the occupants of it wouldn't be there without the due diligence of the club to ensure they align with our clubs excellent values and ethos.....but ex-players of this calibre, to me, are a huge and frankly comforting asset regarding our clubs future direction.

    If I've ranted a bit....I've had a few scotches tonight.
    Im mixed on the whole ex player thing - wholeheartedly agree if they bring other experiences in the real world but definitely not if they just bring their experience from being at the club as a player. Thats the domain of club coaches and development staff and even there I have mixed views over the hiring of people just because they were a player for the club.

  5. #101
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr Magoo View Post
    Im mixed on the whole ex player thing - wholeheartedly agree if they bring other experiences in the real world but definitely not if they just bring their experience from being at the club as a player. Thats the domain of club coaches and development staff and even there I have mixed views over the hiring of people just because they were a player for the club.
    If you were looking at the board of a major bank wouldn’t you like at least one board member to have prior banking executive experience?

    If you were a shareholder would it be concerning if a major bank board was made up of a couple of ex politicians, some mining executives and some FMCG experience, but no banking experience.

    The Swans are in the business of AFL football and I would imagine an ex footballer or coach would ad some relevant experience to the board. I think every former player or former club coach that joins a club board has experience in another field.

    Maybe someone like Dennis Pagan would be great for a club board. As well as being a club coach he’s also had sucess in the real estate and horse racing industries. A brilliant transition out of football.

  6. #102
    Quote Originally Posted by Bangalore Swans View Post
    If you were looking at the board of a major bank wouldn’t you like at least one board member to have prior banking executive experience?

    If you were a shareholder would it be concerning if a major bank board was made up of a couple of ex politicians, some mining executives and some FMCG experience, but no banking experience.

    The Swans are in the business of AFL football and I would imagine an ex footballer or coach would ad some relevant experience to the board. I think every former player or former club coach that joins a club board has experience in another field.

    Maybe someone like Dennis Pagan would be great for a club board. As well as being a club coach he’s also had sucess in the real estate and horse racing industries. A brilliant transition out of football.
    I dont think we disagree - if I was a shareholder of a bank I would want more from a board member than the sum of the experience of that board member is they worked in banking. Theres plenty of people that have done that so why choose that person as the board member. Same with the ex player. Theres plenty of ex players so you would want someone who has attributes beyond being a footy player and being a better player doesn't necessarily mean they are a better and more informed advisor.

  7. #103
    Reefer Madness
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    in a yellow submarine
    Posts
    4,359
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by barry View Post
    I'm all for diversity, but it has to benefit the swans, and I just dont see a strong correlation between the board roles and responsibility and what Mickey O can contribute. No offense to Mickey O, champion player, champion bloke.

    However, it doesnt hurt to have an ex-player on the board, and it doesnt hurt to have an aboriginal perspective on the board as about 11% of players in AFL are indigenous.
    But I dont think we need two ex-players on the board. Mickey O case is better if he replaced Leo Barry.
    Mickey O is a bit more than an 'ex-player'.

    He's also had extensive coaching and development experience - including his time as a coach of both the Swans Academy and AIS AFL.

    He founded the GO Foundation. He also founded and serves as Managing Director of a substantial property, facilities and infrastructure services company.
    'Delicious' is a fun word to say

  8. #104
    Travelling Swannie!! mcs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    7,800
    Quote Originally Posted by i'm-uninformed2 View Post
    Mickey O is a bit more than an 'ex-player'.

    He's also had extensive coaching and development experience - including his time as a coach of both the Swans Academy and AIS AFL.

    He founded the GO Foundation. He also founded and serves as Managing Director of a substantial property, facilities and infrastructure services company.
    Yep its somewhat of a disservice to not recognise the significant 'other' experience beyond his direct time that Micky O brings to the tabled. For a footy club board, he has very well rounded experience highly relevant to the board.

    Both he and Barry would be strong candidates for the board, even if they didn't play for the footy club.
    "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

  9. #105
    Well, possibly for the first time under the current constitution there is a contest for an elected board director position: Two candidates contest Board position (sydneyswans.com.au). I'm excited! Personally I would love to see a bit of an outsider, and someone with a connection to the grassroots, involved. The Board could aways appoint Leo as a Director too when the next vacancy arises if he is not elected and they value his contribution.

    I encourage anyone who is entitled to review the available information about the candidates and to vote.
    All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

  10. #106
    Note also:

    * voting for the non-executive Director position closes 5 pm 28 February. Members entitled to vote, may vote in person at either the club’s Sydney or Melbourne administration facilities, by post, or by sending the completed form via email to [email protected]; and

    * the change in date of the AGM - from 23 February to 2 March.
    All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

  11. #107
    At the AGM today I asked about the club's ownership structure. After the AFL bailed us out 30 years ago they took over control and ownership of the club. According to the club's constitution, this is a 'transitional arrangement'. However, decades have passed and there has been no movement on this front and we never hear about it. What's the story?

    Andrew Pridham replied. He said it was a situation of "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". He also said that since we are owned and controlled by the AFL it's really up to them whether to change this situation. I thought the inference was that it's working out fine for them and so there's no likelihood of this changing for the foreseeable future, thus rendering the idea of this being a "transitional arrangement" a furphy.



    Then again, it has been working pretty well. And Pridham also volunteered that the club is able to operate completely independently and they don't feel fettered by the AFL.

    All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 56789

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO