Page 4 of 20 FirstFirst 1234567814 ... LastLast
Results 37 to 48 of 233

Thread: Rnd.3 V Richmond.

  1. #37
    Veterans List aardvark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Down South
    Posts
    5,681
    Horse might give one of the youngsters the job on Dusty as a learning experience. Warner maybe?

  2. #38
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    1,548
    Quote Originally Posted by Markwebbos View Post
    If Rampe plays on Dusty, we will potentially be one tall defender short. If Mills plays on Dusty (mid and back) that solves the problem, although that's not enough of a reason to do so.
    I always wonder why players don't duck their heads when they try to tackle Dusty in the hope of getting under his fend off, or getting a fend off to the head (i.e. milking a free kick)
    As an ex rugby player myself who then had a belated crack at Aussie Rules I was always surprised at how poor the quality of the tackling in AFL was. The desired result of the tackle varies between the two codes however the purpose is the same namely stop the progress of the player with the ball.
    Dustys fend is straight out the rugby playbook and any player trying to tackle that high deserves a push in the moosh 😀
    In Rugby the hips and midriff are the target area and I have always felt that in AFL just aiming a little higher than that with an aim to wrap the arms but with the tackler keeping the head down a bit lower would achieve better results.
    Although having said that I am not exactly well qualified and I am sure that our coaches do have the players practice tackling , although when I played AFL it didn’t receive much attention.

  3. #39
    Ego alta, ergo ictus Ruck'n'Roll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Over here!
    Posts
    3,875
    Quote Originally Posted by Markwebbos View Post
    I like the idea of Mills following Dusty everywhere. Not sure he’s quick enough though.
    If memory serves, I believe George has blunted his effectiveness as well as any. I think we should give him the task.
    Loose translation from the Latin is - I am tall, so I hit out.

  4. #40
    Captain of the Side Captain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Northern Beaches
    Posts
    3,576
    We can win this!

    Rampe to take Jack, McCartin to take Lynch and Hewett to put a hard tag on Dusty.

  5. #41
    Veterans List aardvark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Down South
    Posts
    5,681

  6. #42
    Apologies. I forgot about the 5 day break. I need to resubmit the team.

    Outs:

    Buddy (Managed)
    McDonald (Managed)
    Gulden (Managed
    Campbell (Managed)
    Wicks

    Ins
    Sinclair
    Heywood
    Stephen’s
    Rowbottom
    Melican

    I don’t see any upside in sending our eldest player and our youngest players on a plane to Melbourne against a hard team and getting them to back up 5 days later.

    We need to have our best team for Thursday night prime time at the SCG. We need those extra tickets being sold and more exhilarating football being played. For the exhilarating football to happen you can’t have Buddy or 3 first year players getting tired and weary.

    The 5 guys coming in will all ad something and will be chomping at the bit to get their seasons going.

    It’s a long season. We don’t need to use up the young players fuel on the best team on a large oval on a 5 day break.

    Let’s hit Richmond later on in the season with our best team.

  7. #43
    Is anyone else worried about our defence? All of a sudden we have gone from having a great backline but no forward line, to having a great forward line but a weakish backline. Rampe looks shakey, I'm unsure of Hewett in defence, Lloyd is great at rebounding but not so much at defending and I'm not sure if Dawson is really a defender. I think Richmond will really expose our backline this week unless we make some changes.

    Howver without Brand and Fox its hard to know what to do and Melican is just not up to it. I'd suggest moving Mills to the backline and potentially Reid, with Hewett back in the middle (or tagging Dusty). Does anyone else agree about our defence? Be good to get others thoughts here

  8. #44
    I agree our defence so far this season has been worrisome. I trust the coaches are working on it. I think partly it's the personnel and their form, partly it's the new rules. Rampe and Melican are both searching for form. Mills has departed for the midfield. Gould hasn't got there yet. Brand isn't fit enough. Fox hurt his finger. Teddy, Reg & Smooch are long gone.

    Still, we were good defensively last year so I think we can adapt with the personnel we have once we regain form and fitness. Even so, I hope we recruit another KPP as well as a ruck the coming off season.

    Don't at all agree with Bangalore Swans suggestion to rest so many. Far better we rest them for the Essendon game if needs be. We have a chance to beat Richmond!
    All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

  9. #45
    recruit me pretty please! Cosmic Wizard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Stanmore
    Posts
    611
    We need to change things up a bit; too many defenders looking really shaky.

    Out: Sweet Caroline: the words "touching you, touching me"; this is how global pandemic really get going!

    The eighties bogan who chose the music between goals: I watched the replay, can clearly hear Billie Idol

    Lloyd, looked really bad out there, couldn't tackle, lack any speed, can't kick long, Campbell and Dawson far better than him, lets try someone else.


    In: Stephens and Gould, they are good enough!
    doof-doof

  10. #46
    Quote Originally Posted by bloodspirit View Post
    I agree our defence so far this season has been worrisome. I trust the coaches are working on it. I think partly it's the personnel and their form, partly it's the new rules. Rampe and Melican are both searching for form. Mills has departed for the midfield. Gould hasn't got there yet. Brand isn't fit enough. Fox hurt his finger. Teddy, Reg & Smooch are long gone.

    Still, we were good defensively last year so I think we can adapt with the personnel we have once we regain form and fitness. Even so, I hope we recruit another KPP as well as a ruck the coming off season.

    Don't at all agree with Bangalore Swans suggestion to rest so many. Far better we rest them for the Essendon game if needs be. We have a chance to beat Richmond!
    We do have a chance to beat Richmond, however 4 points is 4 points it doesn’t matter if it happens against Richmond or Essendon.

    I just feel that Gulden, Campbell and McDonald will slow down at some point unless you manage their season. I would rather have those guys firing with Buddy on a Thursday night than coming back from Melbourne batted and bruised by the best team in football.

    We can easily be 3 and 1 after next Thursday by smartly managing the next week. Why spend all the tickets trying to beat Richmond for just 4 points.

  11. #47
    Quote Originally Posted by Bangalore Swans View Post
    Apologies. I forgot about the 5 day break. I need to resubmit the team.

    Outs:

    Buddy (Managed)
    McDonald (Managed)
    Gulden (Managed
    Campbell (Managed)
    Wicks

    Ins
    Sinclair
    Heywood
    Stephen’s
    Rowbottom
    Melican

    I don’t see any upside in sending our eldest player and our youngest players on a plane to Melbourne against a hard team and getting them to back up 5 days later.

    We need to have our best team for Thursday night prime time at the SCG. We need those extra tickets being sold and more exhilarating football being played. For the exhilarating football to happen you can’t have Buddy or 3 first year players getting tired and weary.

    The 5 guys coming in will all ad something and will be chomping at the bit to get their seasons going.

    It’s a long season. We don’t need to use up the young players fuel on the best team on a large oval on a 5 day break.

    Let’s hit Richmond later on in the season with our best team.
    I'm keen to understand why you drop Wicks when he had game high pressure acts of 27, equal team high tackles at 7, kicked a goal, had disposal efficiency of 87% and tagged the crows best backline play maker Brodie Smith out of the game.
    Last edited by barracuda; 29th March 2021 at 03:40 PM.

  12. #48
    Quote Originally Posted by Faunac8 View Post
    As an ex rugby player myself who then had a belated crack at Aussie Rules I was always surprised at how poor the quality of the tackling in AFL was. The desired result of the tackle varies between the two codes however the purpose is the same namely stop the progress of the player with the ball.
    Dustys fend is straight out the rugby playbook and any player trying to tackle that high deserves a push in the moosh 😀
    In Rugby the hips and midriff are the target area and I have always felt that in AFL just aiming a little higher than that with an aim to wrap the arms but with the tackler keeping the head down a bit lower would achieve better results.
    Although having said that I am not exactly well qualified and I am sure that our coaches do have the players practice tackling , although when I played AFL it didn’t receive much attention.
    I think bits because a tackle in AFL around the hips is largely ineffective because the ball holder has free use of his arms to handpass off.

Page 4 of 20 FirstFirst 1234567814 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO