Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 30

Thread: Renaming the Premiership Cup

  1. #1
    Aut vincere aut mori Thunder Shaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    My secret laboratory in the suburbs of Melbourne
    Posts
    3,700

    Renaming the Premiership Cup

    "Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi final

  2. #2
    Please, for the love of God, do not name the premiership cup, the barrasi cup.

    Knee jerk reaction, and gary Lyon carrying on like a pork chop doesn't help

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by barry View Post
    Please, for the love of God, do not name the premiership cup, the barrasi cup.

    Knee jerk reaction, and gary Lyon carrying on like a pork chop doesn't help
    Why not?

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Bloods05 View Post
    Why not?
    We already have the 'barassi line'.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by barry View Post
    We already have the 'barassi line'.
    Not exactly a compelling case. Barassi is the most consequential figure in the history of the game, and few would dispute that claim.

    We have attached names to the awards for the premiership coach and the best player in the Grand Final. Jock McHale and Norm Smith were huge figures, but Barassi surpassed even them.

    What makes him an even more appropriate choice is that he was always an advocate for expanding the game's frontiers, first into Ireland and then into the states that had not experienced its superior qualities. And finally, he represented four clubs during the course of his playing and coaching careers.

    I can think of no more suitable candidate, and I see no obvious reason for leaving the cup without a name.

  6. #6
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Close to the old Lake Oval
    Posts
    3,682
    Quote Originally Posted by Bloods05 View Post
    Not exactly a compelling case. Barassi is the most consequential figure in the history of the game, and few would dispute that claim.

    We have attached names to the awards for the premiership coach and the best player in the Grand Final. Jock McHale and Norm Smith were huge figures, but Barassi surpassed even them.

    What makes him an even more appropriate choice is that he was always an advocate for expanding the game's frontiers, first into Ireland and then into the states that had not experienced its superior qualities. And finally, he represented four clubs during the course of his playing and coaching careers.

    I can think of no more suitable candidate, and I see no obvious reason for leaving the cup without a name.
    Spot on post and hopefully educational for the ignorant

  7. #7
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Inner West
    Posts
    2,352
    I think the AFL are considering the idea of giving the premiership cup a name very seriously. And they should, it's a big deal.
    RB's record as a player (6 flags) and a coach (4 flags) is incredible. As B05 says above Barassi spoke out about things we all
    basically agree on now. And as a Swans supporter who sat thru all those games when he was our coach and even though
    we lost most of them, I always felt with him there we were on an upward path. And clearly we were. If they are going to
    give the cup a name then its very hard to look past RB. He ticks every box.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by KTigers View Post
    I think the AFL are considering the idea of giving the premiership cup a name very seriously. And they should, it's a big deal.
    RB's record as a player (6 flags) and a coach (4 flags) is incredible. As B05 says above Barassi spoke out about things we all
    basically agree on now. And as a Swans supporter who sat thru all those games when he was our coach and even though
    we lost most of them, I always felt with him there we were on an upward path. And clearly we were. If they are going to
    give the cup a name then its very hard to look past RB. He ticks every box.
    100%

  9. #9
    Just give the decision due diligence, not the emotion of his recent death.

    Why not the Michael tuck cup?
    Michael Tuck holds the club record for the most senior games (426), most finals (39), most grand finals (11) and most premierships (7).

    Unlike barassi, a one club loyalty which some value highly.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by barry View Post
    Just give the decision due diligence, not the emotion of his recent death.

    Why not the Michael tuck cup?
    Michael Tuck holds the club record for the most senior games (426), most finals (39), most grand finals (11) and most premierships (7).

    Unlike barassi, a one club loyalty which some value highly.
    Emotion. Don't trust it. Keep it well out of the way.

  11. #11
    Aut vincere aut mori Thunder Shaker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    My secret laboratory in the suburbs of Melbourne
    Posts
    3,700
    Quote Originally Posted by KTigers View Post
    I think the AFL are considering the idea of giving the premiership cup a name very seriously. And they should, it's a big deal.
    As long as they don't flog off the naming rights to the premiership cup to the company with the most cash. Being forced to call it the SPONSOR'S NAME Cup would be crass. I refuse to use such names as a matter of principle.

    Quote Originally Posted by KTigers View Post
    RB's record as a player (6 flags) and a coach (4 flags) is incredible. As B05 says above Barassi spoke out about things we all
    basically agree on now. And as a Swans supporter who sat thru all those games when he was our coach and even though
    we lost most of them, I always felt with him there we were on an upward path. And clearly we were. If they are going to
    give the cup a name then its very hard to look past RB. He ticks every box.
    I would have no problem naming the cup the Barassi Cup. Not straight away though. Such a change should take place from next season, IMO.
    "Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi final

  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Thunder Shaker View Post
    As long as they don't flog off the naming rights to the premiership cup to the company with the most cash. Being forced to call it the SPONSOR'S NAME Cup would be crass. I refuse to use such names as a matter of principle.
    Absolutely with you on that. I can't believe how craven footy supporters have been in rolling over to corporate interests on naming rights. Why do people call Docklands Marvel? Or Colonial, or whatever the sponsor du jour tells them to call it? What kind of Geelong supporter calls Kardinia Park GMHBA Stadium? Even Ikon Park FFS. Yes Carlton don't play there any more, but how can any Carlton supporter use that name? Does anyone call it the Toyota Grand Final?

    I mean, let them shovel their money into the AFL, let them plaster their ads from one end of the ground to the other, but do people really have to buy into it?

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO