having gotten the swans magazine today, i was looking at the team photo and i noticed there were no players from the swans rookie list in that photo. what does this mean? that the rookies are technically not part of the team? the rookies have been included in previous photos, why not this years?
Maybe it was another cost-cutting measure????
I'm on the Chandwagon!!!
If you cannot compete for the premiership, it's better to be young and exciting than middle-aged and dowdy.
Maybe that's why most of them need a haircut.
And why is it that a majority of them aren't smiling? The photo looks terrible.
Bookmarks