has to be freo for me. gave away draft picks, but two super midfielders, lots of talented youth anyway.......
i know that neither carr nor black were ever on the radar for sydney, but
has to be freo for me. gave away draft picks, but two super midfielders, lots of talented youth anyway.......
i know that neither carr nor black were ever on the radar for sydney, but
I wish my weed was EMO so it would cut itself
Hawthorn, in the long term anyway.They won't have a forward line next year, but they have some quality youth coming to the club.
Freo did do well.But lost a tall for a small.
Melbourne did well.
Richmond didn't do too badly either. In effect got Simmonds for Ottens plus a couple of extra first round picks.
I'm on the Chandwagon!!!
If you cannot compete for the premiership, it's better to be young and exciting than middle-aged and dowdy.
Yep, Richmond, they lost Ottens who hadn't performed for them for 2 years anyway, gained Simmonds and have 5 picks in the Top 20.Originally posted by Mike_B
Richmond didn't do too badly either. In effect got Simmonds for Ottens plus a couple of extra first round picks.
Looking good for Plough's five year contract.
Hawthorn easily. Freo did terribly. No way is Josh Carr worth what they paid. Black for Simmonds isn't too bad though...
The only thing that keeps me sane is my collection of singing potatoes.
Carlton supporter and proud of it!
i think that freo would be happy considering port wanted Pav or hasleby. i know they were just "playing hardball" but i think freo will have the biggest noticable advantage next season. good points on the longer term advantages though.......
I wish my weed was EMO so it would cut itself
I reckon Freo overall, with Geelong getting the best available (Ottens).
Occupational hazards:
- animal psychic Amanda de WarrenI don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.
Bookmarks