PDA

View Full Version : Swans vs Dogs: In-game hobnob (aka the game day thread)



Pages : [1] 2

ugg
15th May 2010, 02:02 PM
Bevan in for Bradshaw

Dogs have a late change too
Eagleton in for Griffen

Hanners, Jesse, Marty and Jetstar starting on our bench

satchmopugdog
15th May 2010, 02:12 PM
So nervous I feel sick. Don't think we have a snowball's chance in hell of winning but always get nervous.

Donners
15th May 2010, 02:12 PM
Bevan and Playfair in? AAAAAAAAAAARGH! We're doomed!

Jeffers1984
15th May 2010, 02:16 PM
Grumble Grumble.

Jetta, Rohan and Hannebery to star in a 20 point win to the Swans!

Grumble Grumble.

Matty10
15th May 2010, 02:23 PM
Jetta, Rohan and Hannebery to star in a 20 point win to the Swans!

Alright I'm on board - stuff the Doggies - let's go Swanners!

Peace
15th May 2010, 02:31 PM
im always on board! jetta is going to kick a goal today god damnit!

kangle4
15th May 2010, 02:31 PM
white starting on the bench could mean he is 2nd ruck, playfair must be starting up front.

satchmopugdog
15th May 2010, 02:35 PM
That bloody pink boat is taking a long time to finish so we may not get the first bit of the telecast......so what she sailed all the way around the world....whatever!!!!!!!

kangle4
15th May 2010, 02:36 PM
should still be on one of the channels live, either 10 or one HD.

ugg
15th May 2010, 02:41 PM
Hmm One HD did pay a lot of money as a sponsor.

annew
15th May 2010, 02:42 PM
That bloody pink boat is taking a long time to finish so we may not get the first bit of the telecast......so what she sailed all the way around the world....whatever!!!!!!!

Yeah - who cares. We will have that stupid female commentator too.

Trickster
15th May 2010, 02:47 PM
That bloody pink boat is taking a long time to finish so we may not get the first bit of the telecast......so what she sailed all the way around the world....whatever!!!!!!!

Who really cares about the bint in the boat. they had better plaay the whole game!!!

Jeffers1984
15th May 2010, 02:49 PM
FFS if they don't cut the coverage on one and show the swans game i will go bezerk. It's on every other channel FFS!

Primmy
15th May 2010, 02:49 PM
Oh dear, girl in boat will be in charge of the Swans/Dogs game.....she wins, unless someone at Ten comes to their senses......Don't wish to be churlish , and well done and all that, b ut I had planned to watch AFL FOR PETE'S SAKE!!!! There is all the sailing up the harbour to come, meeting the prime minister, etc, that's going to take hours....

annew
15th May 2010, 02:51 PM
Oh dear, girl in boat will be in charge of the Swans/Dogs game.....she wins, unless someone at Ten comes to their senses......Don't wish to be churlish , and well done and all that, b ut I had planned to watch AFL FOR PETE'S SAKE!!!! There is all the sailing up the harbour to come, meeting the prime minister, etc, that's going to take hours....

Even if we only miss the first quarter - the game will be over!!!!

ugg
15th May 2010, 02:54 PM
Even if we only miss the first quarter - the game will be over!!!!

I like the optimism!

Bas
15th May 2010, 02:58 PM
Jetta to kick first goal in AFL hopefully.

Playfair to kick 6. Jesse 4.

Pyke to play starring role in the ruck.

Boxing Boofy Biffo and Peroxide Punce to kick 1 each.

These dreams....................

Can't someone tow the bloody boat over the line. She won already!!!

Jeffers1984
15th May 2010, 03:00 PM
FUBAR absolutely FUBAR.

Blue Sun
15th May 2010, 03:00 PM
This is ridiculous, melbourne only gets 7 free to air swans game this year. Looks like its only going to be 6.

Not happy Jan!

Jeffers1984
15th May 2010, 03:03 PM
ok we're getting footy at 2:08 on channel 10 (SD)

Swans500
15th May 2010, 03:03 PM
Paid my 6 bucks to Omnisport....watching a blank screen....getting very angry....

Trickster
15th May 2010, 03:03 PM
Ten just announced they will play the game from 2.08

annew
15th May 2010, 03:03 PM
Ring channel 10 now and complain: 02 9650 1010 - they will get sick of it.

Bas
15th May 2010, 03:03 PM
Ch 10 to go to Swans at 2:08pm. Just announced. But you can watch Jessica Simpson on OneHD.

Primmy
15th May 2010, 03:05 PM
9650 1010
This is the channel 10 number to ring up and complain. Every channel i9n sydney is aimed at the harbour.....

stellation
15th May 2010, 03:06 PM
Ch 10 to go to Swans at 2:08pm. Just announced. But you can watch Jessica Simpson on OneHD.

Thanks for that :)

Primmy
15th May 2010, 03:06 PM
Ch 10 to go to Swans at 2:08pm. Just announced. But you can watch Jessica Simpson on OneHD.

Taa, sanity prevails; there is so much mush going on I cannot cope, and its not just the water.....yes churlish, don't care, curmudgeon in residence.

Blue Sun
15th May 2010, 03:07 PM
Just rang channel 10 melbourne then, they will show the game once the Jessica Watson homecoming is over.

Not sure what will happen on channel 10 Sydney.

CureTheSane
15th May 2010, 03:08 PM
@@@@ing channel 10.
@@@@
@@@@
@@@@
7 weeks I've been waiting.
Not like we can't all watch this boat @@@@ on 7 or 9.

Matty10
15th May 2010, 03:08 PM
That really sucks - I would rather they put the game on OneHD.

Bas
15th May 2010, 03:11 PM
Leo Barry on the boundary for MMM. Can't make up his mind which boundary to call from though.

Pyke wins first tap.

Biffo gets 50.

Jeffers1984
15th May 2010, 03:11 PM
Pure stupidity from LRT

ShockOfHair
15th May 2010, 03:11 PM
That's a good start to the game...

Swans500
15th May 2010, 03:12 PM
LRT the MONGREL!!!!

Damien
15th May 2010, 03:12 PM
Don't C10 always show the Sat game at 3pm in Melbourne?

It's on live in Sydney now, LRT gave away a 50m penalty to Hally. Goal. Great start. ARGHH.

Donners
15th May 2010, 03:13 PM
Identical passes at either end of the ground. Bolton drops ours, Hall takes his and kicks the goal.

Trickster
15th May 2010, 03:13 PM
Go Jude!

Damien
15th May 2010, 03:17 PM
Hanners!

UglyDuckling
15th May 2010, 03:17 PM
yes, hanners!!!!!

Jeffers1984
15th May 2010, 03:17 PM
Hanners!

Trickster
15th May 2010, 03:19 PM
Jude!

Damien
15th May 2010, 03:19 PM
What a goal! Go jude!

Jeffers1984
15th May 2010, 03:19 PM
Judey! Great snap!!! Good start!

UglyDuckling
15th May 2010, 03:20 PM
boltons on fire. who needs bradshaw. Early call Doggies look sluggish

Damien
15th May 2010, 03:21 PM
Robbed of a free kick to Teddy, Bulldogs goal. 13 pts each.

Trickster
15th May 2010, 03:21 PM
That doggy goal should not have been paid

Damien
15th May 2010, 03:24 PM
LOVELY goal RED ROOSTER!

Trickster
15th May 2010, 03:24 PM
Goal for the ginger

Xie Shan
15th May 2010, 03:24 PM
Sounds like a great start!!

Studying for an exam, banned myself from the TV/internet coverage for today's game, not feeling great about our chances with depleted ruck/forward stocks... hope we can keep up this start!

Jeffers1984
15th May 2010, 03:24 PM
Rohan!!! Great recovery!

Matty10
15th May 2010, 03:31 PM
I'm at work at the moment (listening to MMM in Melbourne who are covering the Demons v Eagles match - can only get FM) - so any and all comments are appreciated - cheers!

Damien
15th May 2010, 03:31 PM
Higgins Goal WB 21 SYD 20.

Had our chances to effect the turnover, but it ended up being a comedy of errors really. We are having a real dip though.

DeadlyAkkuret
15th May 2010, 03:32 PM
Stream of game?

Damien
15th May 2010, 03:34 PM
Lake goal started from a Grundy mistake. Our small mistakes are costing us BIG time. 27-20

tasswan
15th May 2010, 03:35 PM
We are turning the ball over far too often

Blue Sun
15th May 2010, 03:36 PM
Is it just me or are the bullies getting a lot of frees close to goal?

Bas
15th May 2010, 03:38 PM
Biffo's line break was sad.

Bevan doing outstanding role tackling.

Taidgh grabbing his knee was a worry. Fortunately OK.

O'Keefe having poor day with the boot.

Trickster
15th May 2010, 03:41 PM
Nice mark for Playfair

Bas
15th May 2010, 03:44 PM
How annoying is Lloyd and the female commentator.

tasswan
15th May 2010, 03:44 PM
How annoying is Lloyd and the female commentator.

Very ordinary she seems to have no idea, bit like our defence at the mo

annew
15th May 2010, 03:45 PM
How many so called illegal tackles have there been so far?? At this rate all our players will be suspended.

tasswan
15th May 2010, 03:46 PM
Yeah the one on Jack? was identical to the one by Mummy however Jack stopped his head from touching the ground

Trickster
15th May 2010, 03:47 PM
How annoying is Lloyd and the female commentator.

That nasal whine is giving me a headache

Bas
15th May 2010, 03:48 PM
No forward line for Swans at the moment.

Luffy says Goodes only 1 kick and no marks to qtr time.

Kennelly has right knee strapped now.

Damien
15th May 2010, 03:49 PM
Very ordinary she seems to have no idea, bit like our defence at the mo

Knowledge of the game doesn't bother me she does just as well as the blokes who have never played, just her voice, not a classic commentary voice in the slightest (that's being kind! ;)).

Jeffers1984
15th May 2010, 03:49 PM
really struggling with our clearance work

Damien
15th May 2010, 03:51 PM
Brilliant mark by Grundy and great pass to Bolton. Misses...

Trickster
15th May 2010, 03:52 PM
Three behinds in a minute! @@@@

Bas
15th May 2010, 03:52 PM
She is such a dill. Just said Bolton had 1.1.

Okeefe having a shocker.

Damien
15th May 2010, 03:52 PM
O'Keefes kicking has been horrible this quarter.

Bas
15th May 2010, 03:55 PM
Its Goodes and OKeefe playing somewhere other than Manuka.

Jeffers1984
15th May 2010, 03:57 PM
murdered by the @@@@ing umps again.

annew
15th May 2010, 03:57 PM
We have the book ends - Playfair & LRT - what chance do we have??

Melbournehammer
15th May 2010, 03:57 PM
yes could someone please tell them both to do the easy things

Damien
15th May 2010, 03:59 PM
We have the book ends - Playfair & LRT - what chance do we have??

Playfair needs to work a lot harder, but LRT has been damn good down back today so far. If our midfield and forward line can stop making awful basic mistakes, we would aleviate the pressure on our backline.

Trickster
15th May 2010, 04:01 PM
@@@@ing Dumpires

Jeffers1984
15th May 2010, 04:01 PM
you gotta be @@@@ing kidding me. @@@@ing ump @@@@s.

Damien
15th May 2010, 04:01 PM
DISGRACEFUL DECISION AGAINST GOODES. :mad:

Melbournehammer
15th May 2010, 04:02 PM
Its time to recogise that goodes is not capable of playing as a key forward - when key defenders play on him he does not beat them although i reckon that wasn't a free

Trickster
15th May 2010, 04:02 PM
Dumpires may as well kick goals for the dogs

Bas
15th May 2010, 04:02 PM
Bevan has been bog for Swans.

How was that not a mark to Goodes

Another goal and we're stuffed.

We're now stuffed. Hall gets 3rd.

Melbournehammer
15th May 2010, 04:03 PM
yes five marks three goals. doing terrific.

Blue Sun
15th May 2010, 04:04 PM
Too frustrating to watch, just gets me worked up.

I'll check back in half an hour......hopefully the scoreboard will look a little better.

Melbournehammer
15th May 2010, 04:04 PM
Playfair needs to work a lot harder, but LRT has been damn good down back today so far. If our midfield and forward line can stop making awful basic mistakes, we would aleviate the pressure on our backline.

lrt is getting pumped

DeadlyAkkuret
15th May 2010, 04:05 PM
We really need Bradshaw :(

JudesaGun
15th May 2010, 04:06 PM
Play white forward!!!!!!!!!

Damien
15th May 2010, 04:06 PM
lrt is getting pumped

Little too easy to say IMO, he is doing very well down there.

Dalai Lama
15th May 2010, 04:07 PM
what isthe free kick count?

Matty10
15th May 2010, 04:07 PM
I'll check back in half an hour......hopefully the scoreboard will look a little better.

That's what I was thinking - although with Rex Hunt calling it the "Barry Hall show in Canberra" every time they cross for the scores it makes it hard to ignore - never a good sign.

Damien
15th May 2010, 04:08 PM
Great kick from Goodes to Kennedy please go through...

Damien
15th May 2010, 04:09 PM
Lucky Lucky Lucky Goodes....Idiot to take on 3 players.

Trickster
15th May 2010, 04:10 PM
Finally Goodesy!

Damien
15th May 2010, 04:10 PM
Great goal though, back to 17 points the diff.

Melbournehammer
15th May 2010, 04:12 PM
Little too easy to say IMO, he is doing very well down there.

ok tell me how many one on ones lrt has won...

i'm not saying its easy just he's getting well beaten

Trickster
15th May 2010, 04:12 PM
Shut up LLoyd

Dalai Lama
15th May 2010, 04:13 PM
Iced?

Bas
15th May 2010, 04:14 PM
Two Swans knock themselves off the ball.

Another goal.

Can CH10 put Modern Family on now!

IrishSwanPerth
15th May 2010, 04:14 PM
Living in Perth and the eagles game is in Foxtel and 2 other channels @@@@ing joke. How many TVs do you need to watch the one game

Damien
15th May 2010, 04:14 PM
Another dogs goal. Back to 23pts

Melbournehammer
15th May 2010, 04:15 PM
unbelievably pointless kick from goodes and mal just needed to go for theball

IrishSwanPerth
15th May 2010, 04:16 PM
I bet you we are turing the ball over, like Sunday league players.

tasswan
15th May 2010, 04:17 PM
the one thing I have noticed in the last 2 weeks is there are no link up players, everyone seems to be standing still. the first few games there was lots of linking up and moving quickly

Jeffers1984
15th May 2010, 04:18 PM
Chamberlan you @@@@ing turd

Trickster
15th May 2010, 04:18 PM
From the sound of the crowd the dumpires are about to be lynched

CureTheSane
15th May 2010, 04:19 PM
Match committee 14/03/10: "why don't we ever try Jude in a key forward position?
Match committee 15/03/10 3pm: "oh yeah - that's why....."

Melbournehammer
15th May 2010, 04:19 PM
i agree i think its a function of trailing and a reluctance to run off when the ball is turned over so badly

Dalai Lama
15th May 2010, 04:19 PM
another belting on the cards?:o

Damien
15th May 2010, 04:19 PM
Goal after the siren to Lake. Margin 29, we are inline for a thrashing today. Not looking good.

gossipcom
15th May 2010, 04:19 PM
We're being outplayed so Bulldogs deserve that lead but that HTB against McVeigh was a shocking decision.

Cant turn right
15th May 2010, 04:20 PM
!!!!!*&%$#@

tasswan
15th May 2010, 04:20 PM
They are playing worse than last week

ugg
15th May 2010, 04:21 PM
Thank you Razor Ray.

Q...
15th May 2010, 04:21 PM
By my count that's 4 goals to the dogs from erroneous free kicks and 2 taken away from the swans.

Bas
15th May 2010, 04:21 PM
I tipped Doggies by 46 and I now think I was being conservative.

Down by 29 points at half time, I can't see anyway that we can claw our way back. All the players out make us look a very second rate team.

Brace yourself for another loss and percentage hammering.

Hall to kick 7 or 8.

ugg
15th May 2010, 04:21 PM
Match committee 14/03/10: "why don't we ever try Jude in a key forward position?
Match committee 15/03/10 3pm: "oh yeah - that's why....."
Don't understand this, probably our best forward at the moment.

CureTheSane
15th May 2010, 04:22 PM
Umpires are killing us.
They have a vendetta against us.
They have secret meetings and decide to award frees against the Swans and to only pay frees to teh Swans when they are blatantly obvious.

Or maybe something else.
MAYBE the Swans are giving away free kicks?
Honestly, you'd think from reading RWO that the Swans play like angels and never infringe and that it's all vendetta stuff.
Maybe the Swans shoudl work on training NOT how to infringe so much.

CureTheSane
15th May 2010, 04:23 PM
Don't understand this, probably our best forward at the moment.

I was of the understanding that a forward should be able to kick a goal from an easy set shot.
Let's be honest - Jude is an average kick in general and a shocking kick for goal.

tasswan
15th May 2010, 04:23 PM
we are winning 0% contested football.

Q...
15th May 2010, 04:24 PM
Umpires are killing us.
They have a vendetta against us.
They have secret meetings and decide to award frees against the Swans and to only pay frees to teh Swans when they are blatantly obvious.

Or maybe something else.
MAYBE the Swans are giving away free kicks?
Honestly, you'd think from reading RWO that the Swans play like angels and never infringe and that it's all vendetta stuff.
Maybe the Swans shoudl work on training NOT how to infringe so much.

They are giving away many stupid free kicks, but that doesn't mean that all that are payed against them are there.

tasswan
15th May 2010, 04:24 PM
I agree but there is no consistency with the decisions

annew
15th May 2010, 04:25 PM
We look flat and hopeless and as if we have given up. Think they went in knowing they couldn't win. How is it that BBH can kick goals in Canberra for Dogs but couldn't for us.

IrishSwanPerth
15th May 2010, 04:26 PM
thank god its not on TV in WA. I knew after watching the last qtr against the lions that we havent improved. Simply not good enough, too many players not got what it takes. Listening to the radio last week and people calling in bagging the swans and saying they have played nobody bar the Saints. I guess we havent till last week. Why the @@@@ do we always do silly things and turn the ball over so easily.

CureTheSane
15th May 2010, 04:26 PM
They are giving away many stupid free kicks, but that doesn't mean that all that are payed against them are there.

of course not.
They NEVER are.
All teams have decisions made against them that are wrong.
Talk to ANY fan and they all live the delusion taht the umpires have it in for them.
Mistakes get made, in the end they tend to balance out.

UglyDuckling
15th May 2010, 04:26 PM
that was a horrible quarter of football. Continually turned it over. No target up forward. moved the ball too slowly. Only shining light was mcveigh trying really hard

ugg
15th May 2010, 04:28 PM
I was of the understanding that a forward should be able to kick a goal from an easy set shot.
Let's be honest - Jude is an average kick in general and a shocking kick for goal.
It is but one aspect. He is presenting well and taking good strong marks, unlike any of the other forwards. Got to move Hanners/Jack into the middle and free up Malceski/Kennelly

Damien
15th May 2010, 04:28 PM
They are giving away many stupid free kicks, but that doesn't mean that all that are payed against them are there.

I think it's been inconsistent, while you could probably pay ALL free kicks we have given away, there are multiple examples of the Dogs not giving away free kicks for same offences.

I'm getting too annoyed being on here and watching this. Need to calm down haha

DeadlyAkkuret
15th May 2010, 04:29 PM
The Cats were looking average and we got them back into premiership form, now we're doing the same for the Bulldogs. Not even confident of top 8 anymore.

swansrule100
15th May 2010, 04:30 PM
i feel like everything is going wrong, the free kicks are there and it doesnt change the fact we are outclassed but it seems they occur at the worst time.

After this great start to the season we look good come up to some chances to prove ourselves and get injuries and stupid suspensions and its just sucks.

Roosy must of built his house on an indian burial ground or something

IrishSwanPerth
15th May 2010, 04:34 PM
I love Paul Roos but apart of me is happy he is going, we need to change our game plan. It doesnt work against, Collingwood, Dogs etc.. any team that plays with pace and puts you under pressure. Our players with poor ball skills turn over the ball too easily and are crap under pressure.

DeadlyAkkuret
15th May 2010, 04:37 PM
Roosy must of built his house on an indian burial ground or something

Now we know why he's selling it.

swansrule100
15th May 2010, 04:38 PM
back to watching this @@@@ then

Swans500
15th May 2010, 04:38 PM
Our structure bears no resemblance to what it was two weeks ago, ill luck on all levels....simple as that I feel. They have lost heart as a result....

Q...
15th May 2010, 04:39 PM
of course not.
They NEVER are.
All teams have decisions made against them that are wrong.
Talk to ANY fan and they all live the delusion taht the umpires have it in for them.
Mistakes get made, in the end they tend to balance out.

You seem to have missed my other post. The tendency for them to balance out makes it a little more difficult when a six goal turn around has already occured.

Matty10
15th May 2010, 04:40 PM
After this great start to the season we look good come up to some chances to prove ourselves and get injuries and stupid suspensions and its just sucks.

It really is deflating. Before the start of the season it was all about excitement - but then we did too well and it became all about expectation - like it had been before. Even if we lost, it was the expectation that we were going to have a real crack - I don't have that feeling now, and the excitement is beginning to fade. C'mon Swans - fire up!

Bas
15th May 2010, 04:40 PM
Roos showing the boys a movie at half time. I think it was called: Massacre at Manuka Oval


Bevan wins BOG for the Swans.

Plays next week.

Bas
15th May 2010, 04:42 PM
Now the football Gods are helping Hall.

Game over.

Margie
15th May 2010, 04:43 PM
I love Paul Roos but apart of me is happy he is going, we need to change our game plan. It doesnt work against, Collingwood, Dogs etc.. any team that plays with pace and puts you under pressure. Our players with poor ball skills turn over the ball too easily and are crap under pressure.

I don't think Longmire will change the game plan, though.

It seems luck is against us with injuries etc and having Razor and McBurney as umpires in the same game.

It's hard to watch, that's for sure. We look like a shadow of a team at present - a bit like the Bulldogs looked recently against St Kilda.

I agree with an earlier poster who said we're not linking up. There is no flow, but having so many team changes doesn't help in that regard.

liz
15th May 2010, 04:43 PM
How is it that BBH can kick goals in Canberra for Dogs but couldn't for us.
LOL. He kicked 6 there for us last season.

CureTheSane
15th May 2010, 04:44 PM
I would suggest that a 6 goal turnaround caused by incorrect free kicks is fantasy

gossipcom
15th May 2010, 04:46 PM
Oh we're linking up just linking up with Bulldogs players by handballing it over to them in their goal square.

CureTheSane
15th May 2010, 04:46 PM
Kinda useless if he can't kick a goal.
What he needs is a ghost to receive the quick pass and have a shot.
agree he is presenting and marking well.

annew
15th May 2010, 04:46 PM
It really is deflating. Before the start of the season it was all about excitement - but then we did too well and it became all about expectation - like it had been before. Even if we lost, it was the expectation that we were going to have a real crack - I don't have that feeling now, and the excitement is beginning to fade. C'mon Swans - fire up!

Yeah we don't even look like we are trying - same old same old - too fumbly, too slow and too hopeless

Trickster
15th May 2010, 04:50 PM
That's the second time Shaw has kicked directly to the dogs

Damien
15th May 2010, 04:51 PM
Goal to Goodes. Phew.

Just need a lot more lol

Melbournehammer
15th May 2010, 04:51 PM
goodes has to play on the ball. period.

CureTheSane
15th May 2010, 04:55 PM
Grundy/Mattner - who can tell the difference?

Obviously not the commentators.... :)

Matty10
15th May 2010, 04:56 PM
goodes has to play on the ball. period.

I was thinking that he needed more time there last week - at the very least he is a big body who gets in the way of the opposition - at his best he is sublime.

DeadlyAkkuret
15th May 2010, 04:56 PM
Is White playing up forward?

CureTheSane
15th May 2010, 04:56 PM
At least Roos is trying a few different things now, rather then sticking to the game plan as he used to....

Melbournehammer
15th May 2010, 04:58 PM
just embarassing

Dalai Lama
15th May 2010, 04:58 PM
Is White playing up forward?

Is he playing anywhere?

Swans500
15th May 2010, 04:59 PM
No excuses for this pissweak stuff....

robamiee
15th May 2010, 04:59 PM
only listening on radio as no telecast here in perth..wtf is goign on..are they trying, have they just given up..

Trickster
15th May 2010, 05:00 PM
The death knell in the basckground...

Melbournehammer
15th May 2010, 05:00 PM
it would be nice to have the real o'keefe back sometime

Dalai Lama
15th May 2010, 05:00 PM
No excuses for this pissweak stuff....

Yes there are - Pyke, Richards, Snow White, Rhesus Monkey, LRT, and who ever is picking up Mr Potato Head!

Damien
15th May 2010, 05:01 PM
Another goal to Hall after some stupidity and a free kick from Goodes.

tasswan
15th May 2010, 05:01 PM
I think our so called depth is actually really shallow

annew
15th May 2010, 05:03 PM
I don't know what's worse that stupid bell, the stupid female commentator or the bloody hopeless swans.

Dalai Lama
15th May 2010, 05:04 PM
If Hank Playfair & Father Ted are the depth - we are buried....

Melbournehammer
15th May 2010, 05:04 PM
I don't know what's worse that stupid bell, the stupid female commentator or the bloody hopeless swans.

you can turn the sound down...

Trickster
15th May 2010, 05:04 PM
Lovely goal from Hanners

ScottH
15th May 2010, 05:06 PM
Are we there yet?

Matty10
15th May 2010, 05:08 PM
Are we there yet?

nice.

Snake
15th May 2010, 05:08 PM
Playfair, Shaw & Smith, have gave there best.

The rest is ordinary at best.......

Dalai Lama
15th May 2010, 05:09 PM
will we get close to dropping out of the eight?

tasswan
15th May 2010, 05:09 PM
This is bottom 4 material

Dalai Lama
15th May 2010, 05:10 PM
last week was bottom 4 - this maybe bottom 3?

Melbournehammer
15th May 2010, 05:11 PM
Playfair, Shaw & Smith, have gave there best.

The rest is ordinary at best.......

hannebury, mcveigh also ok, mattner tried hard bolton ok but lots of players well beaten

Damien
15th May 2010, 05:11 PM
Having our best forward, best backman, best two ruckman and a few others out is massive. Trying not to be to angry at this stage because we aren't talking about covering just any few players, we are covering key players and it's not easy.

I really would throw Currie in next week, he will have better general awareness than Pyke. Well worth the risk.

tasswan
15th May 2010, 05:12 PM
This is now the 8th qtr in a row we have lost!

UglyDuckling
15th May 2010, 05:12 PM
no sure about selection for todays match. Why would you put jessie white in the ruck with no bradshaw and leave rohan in the goal square against brian lake in his second game. jessie has done nothing in the ruck, playfair has done nothing up forward. Incorrect decision in selection

swansrule100
15th May 2010, 05:12 PM
i know theres prolly some stats showing pykes hit outs are reasonable effective, but he is a complete and utter waste of space on a footy ground. Why not play currie? even if he gets smashed around like a rag doll at the ruck contest im sure he will actually get a few kicks.

Id even rather just put any old midget in at the bounce and concede the ruck taps than use pyke. Sure we wont a hit out but just chuck another midfielder there and get some stats.

IrishSwanPerth
15th May 2010, 05:13 PM
lol you cant bet on the Dogs at 0.00 great odds haha. Swans $13 Im offering $50

Q...
15th May 2010, 05:13 PM
This is bottom 4 material

While I think you're right, to be fair, take the best two rucks, the best two forwards and the best backman out of any team and I can't imagine that they will do particularly well.

swansrule100
15th May 2010, 05:13 PM
hannebury, mcveigh also ok, mattner tried hard bolton ok but lots of players well beaten

id also say rohan has shown a bit, his work rate is great, hes too light to play basically as a key forward like he is today

tasswan
15th May 2010, 05:13 PM
no sure about selection for todays match. Why would you put jessie white in the ruck with no bradshaw and leave rohan in the goal square against brian lake in his second game. jessie has done nothing in the ruck, playfair has done nothing up forward. Incorrect decision in selection

The seconds had a bye maybe should have played them and given the 1sts the day off

Foreign Legion
15th May 2010, 05:13 PM
Well, today we have learnt that White can't cut it in the ruck. Pyke no good either but White must go back to the forward line. Currie has to come in if Bradshaw doesnt come back next week. We are far too short in the forward line.

How is it that we miss 5 shots in front of goal from under 35 metres - totally unacceptable for professional players!

Commentary on 10 has been pathetic, I don't know how many mistakes Huddo and Underwood have made - just rubbing salt into the wound really. Positives - hmm thats a hard one - I guess Hanners has shown he can play forward at a pinch. Other than that, bugger all.

Jeffers1984
15th May 2010, 05:15 PM
Pyke our new Doughnut king.

Matty10
15th May 2010, 05:17 PM
This really sucks. It is the birthday of my niece tomorrow (turning 5) and she is just starting to take an interest in football teams (and at this stage her team is the Swans, like her uncle - the rest of the family support the Bombers) so guess what her present is - a lovely new Swans guernsey!

A really hops she hasn't watched any of this game - or if she has that she just doesn't understand what is happening.

Blue Sun
15th May 2010, 05:17 PM
Bullies far too good for our severely undermanned side.

Need to get those key players back in.

UglyDuckling
15th May 2010, 05:18 PM
more of the same in the last quarter.
Im getting pretty sick of white going in for these lazy 1 armed tackles. Doesnt chase hard enough for mine.

Trickster
15th May 2010, 05:19 PM
Come on Goodes-get our goal for this quarter

robamiee
15th May 2010, 05:19 PM
is jetta playing in the midfield?

JF_Bay22_SCG
15th May 2010, 05:22 PM
Man are we a very ordinary team. Once again we are slaughtered on the big Manuka ground by an average Dogs teams. The much-vaunted depth we have is a myth. Without Bolton at the back our two ruckmen & Bradshaw at FF we have plodders like Henry Playfair back in the team. We are playing players out of position (Jude Bolton a player who can't kick properly on the forward line WTF?) & have very very little to offer up for. With us being so Bradshaw-centric Jessie White has totally lost his confidence as a forward. And he isn't a very good ruckman either.

How many passengers have we had today? And missing 5 easy shots in the 2nd quarter when we were still in the game is proof that some of the players taking these shots (Bevan Richards) shouldn't be down there in the first place.

And we play Freo next week. Oh joy!

JF (happy I'm not in Canberra & am sitting on my bed with 2 dogs on my lap)

Dalai Lama
15th May 2010, 05:24 PM
more of the same in the last quarter.
Im getting pretty sick of white going in for these lazy 1 armed tackles. Doesnt chase hard enough for mine.

It might be too hard to use the other arm with all those tough stickers on?

UglyDuckling
15th May 2010, 05:25 PM
It might be too hard to use the other arm with all those tough stickers on?

time from some lazer removal

Southern Swan15
15th May 2010, 05:26 PM
I know Pyke is only playing cause of injury/ Suspension but he is not an AFL player. Our rucks would have lost against the Crows ruck today.

robamiee
15th May 2010, 05:26 PM
JF (happy I'm not in Canberra & am sitting on my dog with 2 dogs on my lap)

i am sure your dog wouldn't be happy that your sitting on it with another 2 on your lap

Damien
15th May 2010, 05:27 PM
I should give Kennedy a positive mention today. Love his footy smarts.

Dalai Lama
15th May 2010, 05:28 PM
He has some ink work on his arm - and doing some "stink work" on the field?

ernie koala
15th May 2010, 05:29 PM
It's been Roos of old today...conservative, supposedly risk free... with little imagination and no dare. Why he has stuck with White in the ruck is a mystery. White is a forward, he has shown that he thrives as the no. 1 target. I'd prefer Richards rucking, and that's saying something. The Playfair sellection as a leading forward was just woeful, he will never impact on a game, let alone win you one.
Speaking of woeful....the commentary....enough said.

Q...
15th May 2010, 05:30 PM
Pyke wasn't holding the ball and it shouldn't have been fifty...

Diamond Jim
15th May 2010, 05:32 PM
more of the same in the last quarter.
Im getting pretty sick of white going in for these lazy 1 armed tackles. Doesnt chase hard enough for mine.

Very true - the boy has an attitudinal issue - seems to think he deserves a kick.

Reality is, the midfield is getting killed - McVeys down again, Kirky's gone missing (worrying sign) Bolton is playing sore and Hannebury /Jack ar estill cutting their teeth. Even with Jolly back that midfield would struggle atm.

JudesaGun
15th May 2010, 05:33 PM
Playfair is just as bad as Barlow. Goes to ground at every contest and easily pushed off by his man. No second efforts, poor kick and soft.

Southern Swan15
15th May 2010, 05:33 PM
I thought Kelly Underwood was the worst commentator in the history of AFL, Than Matthew Llyod opend his mouth with his "expert commentary" Its a pity he retired and Campebell brown didn't get another crack at him.

Damien
15th May 2010, 05:34 PM
Pyke wasn't holding the ball and it shouldn't have been fifty...

He took the tackler on, it was always going to be a free kick and you never hold the ball and argue with the umpire. Was a very fair decision.

Bas
15th May 2010, 05:35 PM
It's hard to say we don't have depth when you have 6 players out of your team all at the one time.

Trickster
15th May 2010, 05:36 PM
I thought Kelly Underwood was the worst commentator in the history of AFL, Than Matthew Llyod opend his mouth with his "expert commentary" Its a pity he retired and Campebell brown didn't get another crack at him.

I would be hard pressed to decide who I dislike more, mr dive or the brown/gold whiner

ernie koala
15th May 2010, 05:36 PM
I thought Kelly Underwood was the worst commentator in the history of AFL, Than Matthew Llyod opend his mouth with his "expert commentary" Its a pity he retired and Campebell brown didn't get another crack at him.

Don't forget that little twirp Hudson for your trifector....it's the worst commentary team I've heard.

Snake
15th May 2010, 05:39 PM
hannebury, mcveigh also ok, mattner tried hard bolton ok but lots of players well beaten

Do'h, good point!

robamiee
15th May 2010, 05:40 PM
i noticed the bulldogs have had double the free kicks...warranted or have we been hard done by again.
Commentators on radio reckon we have had the rough end of the stick..

next week is crucial for us to remain in that top 4-6 hunt.....

missing those key players certainly cost us. you can cover 2-3, btu you cant cover 6-7 players..
i doubt most teams could. no excuses, but currie needs to have a crack ahead of pyke,

Bas
15th May 2010, 05:45 PM
We're improving !!!!!

We only lost by 38 points this week.

Swans500
15th May 2010, 05:45 PM
Did we actually win a quarter?....

Damien
15th May 2010, 05:46 PM
Did we actually win a quarter?....

Yep won the last quarter. (Mainly due to the Bulldogs missing 7 shots)

Diamond Jim
15th May 2010, 05:46 PM
Don't forget that little twirp Hudson for your trifector....it's the worst commentary team I've heard.

Try Kevin Bartlett......mind of a 5 year old.

UglyDuckling
15th May 2010, 05:46 PM
Very true - the boy has an attitudinal issue - seems to think he deserves a kick.

Reality is, the midfield is getting killed - McVeys down again, Kirky's gone missing (worrying sign) Bolton is playing sore and Hannebury /Jack ar estill cutting their teeth. Even with Jolly back that midfield would struggle atm.

i though mcveigh tried really hard today without much help from the midfield around him.

I would agree about the midfield though Kirk and O'keefe have been quiet since the first quarter and a bit.

I would much prefer white up forward to at least provide a contest against lake to stop him continualy marking at and clearing, giving rohan et al at least a chance at ground level.

JF_Bay22_SCG
15th May 2010, 05:47 PM
Playfair is just as bad as Barlow. Goes to ground at every contest and easily pushed off by his man. No second efforts, poor kick and soft.


Couldn't agree more. A complete waste of a footballer. He will never make it as an AFL footballer any more.

JF

Q...
15th May 2010, 05:47 PM
He took the tackler on, it was always going to be a free kick and you never hold the ball and argue with the umpire. Was a very fair decision.

Prior opportunity is still required, no free. I concede that you shouldn't argue with the umpire or you'll get a fifty.

IrishSwanPerth
15th May 2010, 05:48 PM
I want this season to finish quickly, I get really anoyed when we play crap, why the f==k do we have so many turn overs, poor ball skills, average to poor players and our decision making is awful at times?? Just not good enough. What do they do on the training ground, must just run

Diamond Jim
15th May 2010, 05:52 PM
i though mcveigh tried really hard today without much help from the midfield around him.

I would agree about the midfield though Kirk and O'keefe have been quiet since the first quarter and a bit.

I would much prefer white up forward to at least provide a contest against lake to stop him continualy marking at and clearing, giving rohan et al at least a chance at ground level.

Agree with all that - I think the issue is that the opposition know if they stop McVeigh, it's a coin toss whether Jack or Bolton will take up the slack.

I think O'Keefe's problem is he's trying to do too much.

Margie
15th May 2010, 05:53 PM
I thought Kelly Underwood was the worst commentator in the history of AFL, Than Matthew Llyod opend his mouth with his "expert commentary" Its a pity he retired and Campebell brown didn't get another crack at him.

I turned the sound off. She (and Lloyd) are just painful to listen to.

Cheer_Cheer
15th May 2010, 05:54 PM
Shut up LLoyd

How many times did he say "struggled" ?

Q...
15th May 2010, 05:55 PM
For CTS and maybe Damien,

38 points the difference, first half 4 non free kicks = 4 dogs goals, 2 non free kicks = swans non shots at goal - full time, free kick tally: 20 to 13.

Not saying we didn't play @@@@, but did your claimed tendency occur?

UglyDuckling
15th May 2010, 05:55 PM
Agree with all that - I think the issue is that the opposition know if they stop McVeigh, it's a coin toss whether Jack or Bolton will take up the slack.

I think O'Keefe's problem is he's trying to do too much.

I have a sneaky suspicion that O'Keefe is carrying an injury. he was in really really good form then a few weeks ago completely dropped off. Again today he was OK early then hardly touched it in the second half, to me that would indicate an injury that gets sorer as the game wears on.

Swans500
15th May 2010, 05:57 PM
This is all bitterly disappointing ...after winning 5 in a row, good game against Saint Kilda...won most of the pre season matches for once. Was it all an abheration?

Damien
15th May 2010, 05:57 PM
For CTS and maybe Damien,

38 points the difference, first half 4 non free kicks = 4 dogs goals, 2 non free kicks = swans non shots at goal - full time, free kick tally: 20 to 13.

Not saying we didn't play @@@@, but did your claimed tendency occur?

Not quite sure why directed at me lol I agreed with the Pyke descion, I didn't make any other claims on the overall umpiring lol

Q...
15th May 2010, 05:57 PM
Although his sentences aren't as well formed as you might like, I still agree with Lloyd's appraisal of the situation: you can't have those particular players out and expect to set the world on fire. Just think about what is lost when you have to use Bolton as your primary target up forward for a half...

Foreign Legion
15th May 2010, 05:57 PM
The only good things to come out of this game were that I thought Shaw was very good, Smith is unobtrusive but does a good defensive job and I guess Mattner was OK. All in the backline unfortunately.

Goodesy did well and at least he kicks 'em when in front. Very handy the 2's had a bye - NOT! No exposed form to put pressure on the rest.

Have to stick with Pyke for next week - but I reckon we'll do OK against Freo at SCG.

Blue Sun
15th May 2010, 05:58 PM
This is all bitterly disappointing ...after winning 5 in a row, good game against Saint Kilda...won most of the pre season matches for once. Was it all an abheration?

We have pretty significant injuries, 6 key players.

Damien
15th May 2010, 06:00 PM
We have pretty significant injuries, 6 key players.

Like i mentioned earlier, it is very rare that you lose your best backman, best forward, 2 best ruckman and a goal sneak. Our injuries have come at a horrible time, taking on Geelong then the Dogs with our injury toll is just plain unlucky.

Swans500
15th May 2010, 06:01 PM
We have pretty significant injuries, 6 key players.

True...but we only look like getting 2 of the 6 back in the near future!

swans_premiers
15th May 2010, 06:02 PM
We have pretty significant injuries, 6 key players.

We are missing our entire forward line...

Bradshaw...not there
White...Playing in ruck
Mycglyn....injured
Moore..Injured
Goodes there but also in midfield

We beat them in inside 50's just couldn't put it on the score board.


Had we had our proper structure of Bradshaw, White, Mcglynn, Moore, Goodes + a resting midfielder today would have been a different store.

lwjoyner
15th May 2010, 06:03 PM
sure we missed all these players, but the selectors got it wrong. When it was obvious to most that Braddy wasnt going to play and a loss was inevitable they should have tried some of the youngsters Currie Ves etc instead of playfair bevan etc. The kids need game time playfair isnt going to ever give us anything.

Schwatted
15th May 2010, 06:04 PM
The Swans seem to forget what play on is when they come up against opposition they think are good? too many missed kicks and lack of pressure on the ball handler...the 5 games we won in you'll notice that we actually played on and hit our targets, the past two weeks we have held up play at every chance and have turned the ball over each time.....what I'd give to see the play on swans each week...

Legs Akimbo
15th May 2010, 06:06 PM
Finally got to watch a game on TV. Not sure that was a good or bad thing.

We lost this game on Thursday when they picked Henry Playfair ahead of 3-4 other guys who should have been selected.

There is no way we can win with Playfair, Richards, LRT, Pyke and Bevan all in thes same team. Of those five, I have time for LRT and Pyke and Richards gave us a few good years, but five basically unco footy players with dodgy disposal up against the against the Bulldogs machine ...

A few other observations

1. Roos needs to show some discipline and let White play in a position. Although he did not kick a lot of goals, he was good in the first 5 rounds and he worked well with Bradshaw and Goodes. He has never played well in the ruck and he has only played well in the forward line and best at FF. Pretty bloody obvious really. Bevan at full forward was simply ludicrous.

2. Jetta looks lost. Confidence? Rohan may be talented but he has probably realised in the last 2 weeks that he has a long road in front of him. They should persist.

3. Bevan and Playfair should have their cards stamped with the same one we hope has been used on Barlow. List cloggers.

4. On the other hand, I really like the look of Pyke - the pace of his development has been incredible. His tapwork is really good and I think he could be an effective fullback too.

Not much else to say really. Expected to lose and we lost. The fact that Henry is a top bloke is not enough. They should have played Curry.

ugg
15th May 2010, 06:07 PM
Harsh on Bevan thought he had a solid game, more so in the first half. Not sure that bombing it long to him against guys like Brian Lake and Tom Williams was a smart game plan.

Q...
15th May 2010, 06:13 PM
Not quite sure why directed at me lol I agreed with the Pyke descion, I didn't make any other claims on the overall umpiring lol

That's probably why. You'll note that I said "maybe Damien". ;)

Swans500
15th May 2010, 06:14 PM
FFS...on SEN they are saying that Bradshaws' injury is more severe than being admitted?!

Q...
15th May 2010, 06:14 PM
Harsh on Bevan thought he had a solid game, more so in the first half. Not sure that bombing it long to him against guys like Brian Lake and Tom Williams was a smart game plan.

I thought Bevan was a highlight...

annew
15th May 2010, 06:16 PM
Like i mentioned earlier, it is very rare that you lose your best backman, best forward, 2 best ruckman and a goal sneak. Our injuries have come at a horrible time, taking on Geelong then the Dogs with our injury toll is just plain unlucky.

Oh well we get a chance to redeem at the end of the season if that is the case.

Q...
15th May 2010, 06:20 PM
sure we missed all these players, but the selectors got it wrong. When it was obvious to most that Braddy wasnt going to play and a loss was inevitable they should have tried some of the youngsters Currie Ves etc instead of playfair bevan etc. The kids need game time playfair isnt going to ever give us anything.

Playfair's on the list. Obviously the powers that be made the decision that he may be able to provide something at some stage. The kids have time to show their wares, Playfair is obviously running out of time. If you start with your premises (which I happen to think are correct) then your conclusion should be that it was correct to put playfair in now.

Damien
15th May 2010, 06:22 PM
FFS...on SEN they are saying that Bradshaws' injury is more severe than being admitted?!

Inside word at the time of his pre season surgery was that his knee would require care all year, so it wouldn't surpise me. Fingers crossed though.

Q...
15th May 2010, 06:27 PM
The Swans seem to forget what play on is when they come up against opposition they think are good? too many missed kicks and lack of pressure on the ball handler...the 5 games we won in you'll notice that we actually played on and hit our targets, the past two weeks we have held up play at every chance and have turned the ball over each time.....what I'd give to see the play on swans each week...

Agreed. As much is possible though. It's easier to do with some teams. We did have the best disposal efficiency in the comp while we were going through that period...

annew
15th May 2010, 06:29 PM
We are missing our entire forward line...

Bradshaw...not there
White...Playing in ruck
Mycglyn....injured
Moore..Injured
Goodes there but also in midfield

We beat them in inside 50's just couldn't put it on the score board.


Had we had our proper structure of Bradshaw, White, Mcglynn, Moore, Goodes + a resting midfielder today would have been a different store.

If you took Cloke, Medhurst, Jolly & Maxwell out of Collingwood or Mooney, Johnson, Ottens & Scarlett out of Geeling these teams would also be more vulnerable - look at St Kilda they are not as threatening and they only lost Riedwoldt. It is not just the players it is the whole structure.

mcs
15th May 2010, 06:30 PM
Just back from the game and what a disappointing performance... imo worse than last week as the Dogs didn't have the class to really put us away late (And frankly had no need to). So many passengers today. The big worry was that for the 2nd week we were awful around the clearances, so incredibly slow and the dogs like Geelong had so much time to easily clear. They outworked, out tackled and out run us, as per the usual. Although we did improve in terms of getting it forward today, I still think we were easily outplayed and even with the amount of players out, I thought we were fairly comprehensively beaten.

There were some positives from today though. I thought Hanners did well again (He is going to be an absolute gun imo), Rohan again showed glimpses of what he can do, Pyke did some good tap work and we did keep up the effort all day.

So many negatives. Playfair needs to have his card stamped like Barlow.

As decent as Pyke could be around the ruck, if he can't learn to contribute around the ground, than he isn't worth the effort perservering with. The age of the Dinosaur Ruckman in the AFL is long long gone, and he just doesn't to me have the instinct needed to succeed at the moment.

Jesse did alright today, but he desperately needs to work harder on the second effort, as this is where he really is let down often.

Ryan O'Keefe imo is clearly carrying injury (I'd say at a guess somewhere in the Groin injury) had no legs to chase and was struggling to hang on to a mark and kick- lets hope we aren't playing him when we shouldn't be.

There was so much poor disposal and poor decision making today which was a real disappointment, especially after what had looked a real improvement early in the season. Might be due to the lack of personnel, but so many times we just did dumb things.

As for the Yellow Maggotts, nothing new. Just as we were building some momentum in the 2nd quarter they came up with that 12-pointer against Goodes. Absolutely killed our bit of a push and that was that. Not that they were anywhere near the deciding factor today, but there is so little consistency and its so frustrating to watch.

Reggi
15th May 2010, 06:31 PM
SEN was right, our big guys Playfair, Pyke, Richards and White were useless and we were better off playing some ruck rover types.

Clearly we don't have the depth or fitness at the moment. We probably will get into the bottom part of the eight, but are a way off, hopefully we get Lewis Jetta, Lewis Johnston, Veszpremi & Meredith up before then end of the year

We really need to get Mumford & Seaby back. Playfair is just a list clogger

Nico
15th May 2010, 06:31 PM
i noticed the bulldogs have had double the free kicks...warranted or have we been hard done by again.
Commentators on radio reckon we have had the rough end of the stick..

next week is crucial for us to remain in that top 4-6 hunt.....

missing those key players certainly cost us. you can cover 2-3, btu you cant cover 6-7 players..
i doubt most teams could. no excuses, but currie needs to have a crack ahead of pyke,

It's who you replace the injured players with. To bring in the likes of Richards (slow in all aspects of his game) Playfair (whew, slow, knocked off ball easily, wont move it on) Bevan (slow) really tells a story. 3 players who did not get to the fall of the ball. Pyke, for all that he tries, is just not up to it.

mcs
15th May 2010, 06:32 PM
Agreed. As much is possible though. It's easier to do with some teams. We did have the best disposal efficiency in the comp while we were going through that period...
Certainly noticed this to. We weren't helped at least twice if not 3 times early on when we got free kicks and the umps stopped us from playing on or bought the play back.

I think in reality the biggest problem we have now is that when we have a fit and ready to go top 22, they are probably able to match it with most sides in the league. but when we have a few key players out, than there is absolutely no depth in those positions and we struggle.

Nico
15th May 2010, 06:34 PM
Prior opportunity is still required, no free. I concede that you shouldn't argue with the umpire or you'll get a fifty.

The McVeigh decision where he was muscled backwards over the line with the player pinning him front on, with no prior opportunity, smacks of an umpire who has NFI.

Nico
15th May 2010, 06:37 PM
I have a sneaky suspicion that O'Keefe is carrying an injury. he was in really really good form then a few weeks ago completely dropped off. Again today he was OK early then hardly touched it in the second half, to me that would indicate an injury that gets sorer as the game wears on.

Or still suffering for the slam tackled in the brisbane game that went unnoticed by the match review panel.

giant
15th May 2010, 06:38 PM
They were too good and too strong as I expected them to be. And we were murdered by the umps (limping right now after kicking our sofa after that appalling decision vs Goodes that ended in a goal to the Dogs - crucial time of the game too when we'd dominated the forst 10 mins of the 2nd qr).

I guess we're learning that our depth isn't what we thought it was. Need some big strong bodies back in there.

Q...
15th May 2010, 06:39 PM
Certainly noticed this to. We weren't helped at least twice if not 3 times early on when we got free kicks and the umps stopped us from playing on or bought the play back.

I think in reality the biggest problem we have now is that when we have a fit and ready to go top 22, they are probably able to match it with most sides in the league. but when we have a few key players out, than there is absolutely no depth in those positions and we struggle.

Agreed. Our biggest problem, as a team and supporters, is that we have lost players of that calibre as we move into the "month to prove we're not @@@@". We beat the teams down the botttom, but us beating them contributed to them being down the bottom...

Yuri H
15th May 2010, 06:40 PM
Or still suffering for the slam tackled in the brisbane game that went unnoticed by the match review panel.

That's what I'm thinking. He got another whallop last week too; he might be a bit more concussed than they think.

giant
15th May 2010, 06:40 PM
Ryan O'Keefe imo is clearly carrying injury (I'd say at a guess somewhere in the Groin injury) had no legs to chase and was struggling to hang on to a mark and kick- lets hope we aren't playing him when we shouldn't be.

Absolutely - his opponent has murdered us the last two weeks. Desperately needs a break, as he's giving us very little atm.

JF_Bay22_SCG
15th May 2010, 06:40 PM
We are missing our entire forward line...

Bradshaw...not there
White...Playing in ruck
Mycglyn....injured
Moore..Injured
Goodes there but also in midfield

We beat them in inside 50's just couldn't put it on the score board.


Had we had our proper structure of Bradshaw, White, Mcglynn, Moore, Goodes + a resting midfielder today would have been a different store.

Plus we missed 5 shots in a row in the 2nd quarter when we were very much still in the game. Because players who were playing were only there because of the injuries.

JF

Q...
15th May 2010, 06:40 PM
The McVeigh decision where he was muscled backwards over the line with the player pinning him front on, with no prior opportunity, smacks of an umpire who has NFI.

I agree. That one, that quickly led to another non free, was absolutely ridiculous.

Nico
15th May 2010, 06:45 PM
Harsh on Bevan thought he had a solid game, more so in the first half. Not sure that bombing it long to him against guys like Brian Lake and Tom Williams was a smart game plan.

When we didn't kick it long we had no one making space or leading up with any space on their opponents. What's wrong with forwards playing in front. On a number of occasions we had 3 up in the forward line, ball drops front or back of the pack, and they take it away with ease with their players who stay down. In the first and last quarters we ran it long and reseonably quickly into the forward line. The middle quarters it was crap little kicks to players under the pump. We did a lot wrong today in the brain department.

I wonder if the 9 day versus 6 days between games had some influence.

ROK Lobster
15th May 2010, 06:47 PM
Just back from the game. We were never in it, even when we were in it. They looked to do it so much easier the first quarter. At the first break I thought it could have been 100 points!

As much as we need him, LRT is still as crap as ever.

Good to see Hall finally getting some free kiks though :rolleyes:

Nico
15th May 2010, 06:51 PM
They were too good and too strong as I expected them to be. And we were murdered by the umps (limping right now after kicking our sofa after that appalling decision vs Goodes that ended in a goal to the Dogs - crucial time of the game too when we'd dominated the forst 10 mins of the 2nd qr).

I guess we're learning that our depth isn't what we thought it was. Need some big strong bodies back in there.

All that wind about players taking dives at the start of the season being cited. It was a side on body contact by Goodes if anything, and Morris just threw his arms and body forward, and it was as the ball arrived.