Rest Easy?

[Go Swannies]

This should relax a few nerves:

Stats and momentum say Sydney won’t beat Hawthorn, they’ll destroy them | The Roar (http://www.theroar.com.au/2014/09/24/stats-momentum-say-sydney-wont-beat-hawthorn-theyll-destroy/)

But it hasn't helped me.

[Zlatorog]

Nope, Not me. Every time we were expected to win we lost, so I'm never confident in our win. It will take time for me to adjust to our "super power club".

[Swansongster]

This should relax a few nerves:

Stats and momentum say Sydney won�t beat Hawthorn, they�ll destroy them | The Roar (http://www.theroar.com.au/2014/09/24/stats-momentum-say-sydney-wont-beat-hawthorn-theyll-destroy/)

But it hasn't helped me.

Thanks for that (as I wipe away the stats mania drivel). Love a good piece of statistical analysis.

[Jewels]

This should relax a few nerves:

Stats and momentum say Sydney won�t beat Hawthorn, they�ll destroy them | The Roar (http://www.theroar.com.au/2014/09/24/stats-momentum-say-sydney-wont-beat-hawthorn-theyll-destroy/)

But it hasn't helped me.

My only problem with that is "statistically" North shouldn't have made the prelim!
I reckon differentials would have been a lot different if we had played Port and Hawks played North!

[dimelb]

My only problem with that is "statistically" North shouldn't have made the prelim!
I reckon differentials would have been a lot different if we had played Port and Hawks played North!

I agree. The stats were skewed not by the difference between Hawks and us but by the difference between Port and North. Hawthorn were more than a little lucky to get over Port, and I'd bet they won't be leaving anything to luck on Saturday.

On paper you'd think we win, but I'll believe it when I see it. GO BLOODS!