O'Keefe takes aim at critics

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Darren Thomson
    replied
    How did this get to be another bag Roos thread, wasn't it about Ryan? Where did it all go wrong?

    Leave a comment:


  • goswannie14
    replied
    Originally posted by ScottH
    Did anyone see Amon's interview last night?
    He may win tool of the week with his execution of the English Language.
    Saw it on TFS last night, funniest thing I have seen in a while. All because he didn't want to say Footscray was out of form.

    Leave a comment:


  • hammo
    replied
    According to Barry Hall, Roos doesn't play mind games and was just speaking the truth.

    A few people have suggested that when Roosy came out a couple of weeks ago and said he thought it was the end of an era he was playing mind games to motivate the players.

    I don't really think mind games are Roosy's thing.
    Expect Rodney's Dogs to be ready - realfooty.com.au

    Leave a comment:


  • DeadlyAkkuret
    replied
    Originally posted by hammo
    How does that prove it wasn't a rev up? Because the site decided to add the brutally honest part after it?

    Leave a comment:


  • DeadlyAkkuret
    replied
    Originally posted by timthefish
    no, that can't be. that would mean that a premiership coach and 300+ player might not only know more about footy and his plans than some on this site but also not feel the need to explain himself to them.

    surely it's easier for everyone if he's just an arrogant overachiever.
    You're my hero

    Leave a comment:


  • reigning premier
    replied
    Originally posted by hammo
    I wouldn't read to much into that article. It included this statement.

    And Roos has not ruled out dropping some of his underperforming senior players and blooding more youngsters next week and in the finals.

    Leave a comment:


  • dimelb
    replied
    Comes down to the question everyone wants answered: how do you switch players on? Is it up to them? The coach? The alignment of the planets? Nobody seems to know, but we can certainly tell the difference.
    Roos was right, they were not going to do much damage the way they were travelling when he said that; but perhaps to say so made the difference.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lohengrin
    replied
    Interesting that the team's current resurgence is the result of the coach's rev-up during the week and at half time, but when the team is struggling it is because the players can't perform sufficiently well. Seems rather one-sided.

    Leave a comment:


  • connolly
    replied
    Originally posted by hammo
    Hammo great coaches do successfully challenge their players. i reckon Scott is on to something to describe our performance on Saturday night as a Rocky. The best rev up in the history of sport cinema is the The Duke when he gives it to the aging (or is it aged) Rocky Balboa:

    To beat this guy, you need speed - you don't have it. And your knees can't take the pounding, so hard running is out. And you got arthritis in your neck, and you've got calcium deposits on most of your joints, so sparring is out. So, what we'll be calling on is good ol? fashion blunt force trauma. Horsepower. Heavy-duty, cast-iron, piledriving punches that will have to hurt so much they'll rattle his ancestors. Every time you hit him with a shot, it's gotta feel like he tried kissing the express train. Yeah! Let's start building some hurtin' bombs!

    Don't know what Roosey said at half time on Saturday night but we came out with heavy duty horse power.

    Leave a comment:


  • hammo
    replied
    Originally posted by timthefish
    no, that can't be. that would mean that a premiership coach and 300+ player might not only know more about footy and his plans than some on this site but also not feel the need to explain himself to them.

    surely it's easier for everyone if he's just an arrogant overachiever.
    "It's unlikely we're going to do much damage over the next few weeks," a brutally honest Roos said after the match.
    Sportal > AFL > News

    Leave a comment:


  • Lohengrin
    replied
    Originally posted by timthefish
    no, that can't be. that would mean that a premiership coach and 300+ player might not only know more about footy and his plans than some on this site but also not feel the need to explain himself to them.

    surely it's easier for everyone if he's just an arrogant overachiever.
    According to some here Matthews, Blight, Sheedy and Malthouse don't know much about football.

    Leave a comment:


  • timthefish
    replied
    Originally posted by connolly
    Might be more accurate to say that he challenged them. And they responded.
    no, that can't be. that would mean that a premiership coach and 300+ player might not only know more about footy and his plans than some on this site but also not feel the need to explain himself to them.

    surely it's easier for everyone if he's just an arrogant overachiever.

    Leave a comment:


  • 2005
    replied
    Originally posted by ScottH
    Source


    Did anyone see Amon's interview last night?
    He may win tool of the week with his execution of the English Language.
    Scott , It will @@@@ it in mate !

    Goes to show how seriously some players take those interviews,he honestly didnt know what he was talking about and showed that Monty aint a brain surgeon !

    Leave a comment:


  • connolly
    replied
    Originally posted by hammo
    Do the players realise it was actually their coach who wrote them off?
    Might be more accurate to say that he challenged them. And they responded.

    Leave a comment:


  • hammo
    replied
    Do the players realise it was actually their coach who wrote them off?

    Leave a comment:

Working...