Draft talk for 2009

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Jewels
    replied
    Originally posted by Bas
    I can't see us taking Ball, not if he doesn't want to come up here.
    It would be a little hypocritical if we did considering our stance on Bradshaw being allowed to live and play where he wishes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bas
    replied
    I can't see us taking Ball, not if he doesn't want to come up here.

    Leave a comment:


  • g60
    replied
    is there a posibility we could take adam's brother as a mature aged rookie this year?

    Leave a comment:


  • BeeEmmAre
    replied
    Originally posted by BeeEmmAre
    Does anyone agree with me that No.14 wouldn't be wasted if we stole everyone's thunder with one L.Ball?
    As I said here the other day, I reckon it would be great to get Ball as a readymade midfielder at 14 if our other targets are gone.




    And if he still ain't happy in 12 months (which I reckon he would be), there's a club with 10 first round draft picks to deal with next year.

    Leave a comment:


  • Auntie.Gerald
    replied
    with Goodes moving upfront and Kirk moving on in 2010 now doubt and jude not far off .........Ball is still an option if we have the cash..

    If we get Rohan I am happy to take on Ball as well unless we push Shaw on to the wing etc in 2010.........plus because Bird, Kennedy and or McGlynn are not sure bets that they will compliment to make a top 6 ranked midfield in the comp....they are depth players at this stage

    Leave a comment:

Working...