Bombers vs Swans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Kirkari
    replied
    Originally posted by Matt79
    I would think Spahnger is almost a certainty and perhaps Nipper a chance too. Malceski or Everitt to possibly come in with the sub vest too.

    Looking at 2-3 changes. May look like this IMO

    IN: Spangher, Gordon, Malceski
    OUT: Parker (inj), McGlynn (Susp), Pyke
    Can't see Pyke getting dropped when that combo worked so well, even in the wet. You'd think under the roof would be even better for three talls.

    I don't know why Malceski was dropped so who knows if he's done what he needs to do to come back in. Both Spang AND Nipper might just be one wild child too many and too soon. So I'm going to vote for Spang and Mal for Parker and McGlynn.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucky Knickers
    replied
    Originally posted by nomae
    Mitchell for Parker?
    Originally posted by GongSwan
    Only played half a game of ressies this week, no chance
    Wonder if the coaches will start trying to up his work rate to bring him in to cover for Parker. Seems perfect cover for him.

    Leave a comment:


  • jono2707
    replied
    2 forced changes is enough. Pykey was good and he'll stay, especially with Mummy still a bit short of a run...

    Leave a comment:


  • aardvark
    replied
    Originally posted by Matt79
    OUT: Parker (inj), McGlynn (Susp), Pyke
    Pyke has 40 hit outs and 10 possessions and he's getting dropped. A little bit harsh don't you think?

    Leave a comment:


  • Matt79
    replied
    I would think Spahnger is almost a certainty and perhaps Nipper a chance too. Malceski or Everitt to possibly come in with the sub vest too.

    Looking at 2-3 changes. May look like this IMO

    IN: Spangher, Gordon, Malceski
    OUT: Parker (inj), McGlynn (Susp), Pyke

    Leave a comment:

Working...