Is this the hardest decision the club will make over the off-season or the easiest?
The rotation was a blazing success? It lifted players and grew the confidence of the leadership team significantly. I firmly believe that having such an experienced accountable group won us the flag. I think the rotation was the number one psycological edge we had over the rest of the competition on the road to the flag.
Is the rotation something that should be continued in 2006 or has it done its job (see above), so therefore let's go back to appointing one skipper from here on?
Thinking of the player psychology for a minute, will it be detrimental to the other leaders if just one man is elected?
What do you RWOers want to see?
Personally, I believe that a continual rotation might dilute the meaning of the captaincy leadership role over time. I think it has served its purpose (players have grown into very accountable leaders) and now it is time for our leaders to elect a captain for all time.
I can't get a struck match between, Kirky & Baz (for different reasons) and I wouldn't be disappointed if it was Goodesy.
Thoughts?
Bookmarks