"It's up to the rest of the players in the room to make a new batch of premiership players next year," Adam Goodes, triple Bob Skilton Medallist, October 7, 2011.
YOU BETCHA!!!!!!
Definitely the 8 - possibility of top four depending on injuries.
MADNow this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...
Pushin Limits
Some of criticism especially towards Jude Bolton, Jarrad McVeigh, Ben Mathews and Paul Bevan here is over the top BS at times!!
I just shake my head and wonder at some people at times.
Granted that Mathews was lucky to play all 23 games last year, but he must have done the job that was required for him to play in every game. Did people think about that before criticising him?
I think we should all expect the best from the team. I think they will be up in the top eight, maybe even top four. I never write the Swannies off, they are a tough determined unit.
Granted that a firing Goodes is great, I would not have thought he was the barometer. Unfortunately I think it is Bazza. I have seen plenty of games when Goodes has had a blinder and the rest of the team stunk, but when Bazza plays well so does the rest of the team. It probably indicates that the skills are up if they can pin point Bazza, through his triple teaming.
On the topic, the Footy hand out in the Sun Herald last sunday, 2/03/08, predicted 7th place.
from memory:
- cats
- weagles
- hawks?
- ?
- pies
- ?
- swans
- lions
Last edited by RogueSwan; 11th March 2008 at 08:45 AM.
"Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017
Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT
However, the question must be asked as to why RWO judge them as playing badly when the coaches judge them as playing well? Are we so much better informed than the Swans' coaching team? And how weird is it that the coaches' favouritism is so pronounced that they even give them regular B&F votes yet the Swans' board choses to ignore this?
Now here's a scandal worthy of AFL investigation.
But the Swans' match selectors consistently pick Mathews, McVeigh and Bevan. The only options are:
1. they are considered the best selections,
2. there are no other options,
3. they are being picked so the Swans will lose,
4. they have such influence over the selectors that they are being picked against the best interests of the club.
Which option do you pick?
7. there is no clear separation between then playing group and the selection committee.
Bookmarks