Almost impossible. My initial response was answering a 'why not' question. My subsequent post was 'this is why', because 'why not' seemed pessimistic. There are a multitude of other factors too. All hypotheticals, I'm afraid, unless we have intimate knowledge of his situation (which the club should not give, because of patient confidentially) but probably more accurate that the New Idea poorly substantiated, conjecture riddled, "reporting" of the Buddy situation. It was more to give insight as to what could influence outcome.
Not sure that it's been reported (I haven't heard)
Pretty much the same as for most people.
There are many ways to perform an ACL reconstruction but many of them removing the torn ACL anyway (otherwise it would impinge with the new graft in a confined space within the knee ie the intercondylar notch of the femur).
It's also not uncommon for a surgeon with a first time ACL rupture to perform an initial "exploratory/examination" arthroscopy to assess the knee & clean up meniscal & chondral cartilage (& to establish that the ACL is ruptured & actually requires reconstruction) and then, once the inflammation has settled, subsequently perform the reconstruction.
Without typing a massive response, that is a simple answer to your postulation. Bear in mind, however, ACL recons are often done with out an initial arthroscopy, & some reconstructive procedures can preserve part (or all) of the ACL.
Quite possibly. We can postulate all we want but without facts to base it on, it's simply hypothetical.
All to be taken with a disclaimer of it being general information only. I have no insider knowledge of AJs specific circumstances, nor should RWO readers use it as medical advice for their own circumstances. Having said that, you're most welcome
Bookmarks