Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 25 to 36 of 78

Thread: A trade for Seaby

  1. #25
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Canberra
    Posts
    1,041
    Giles was in the SANFL team of the year last year and I reckon he's actually a shot at retaining the captaincy.

    It's possibly also worth considering whether Freo's Griffin will be on the market too.

  2. #26
    Senior Player GongSwan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Wollongong NSW
    Posts
    1,362
    If Seaby asks to be traded the best option would be GWS ( for us) a first round draft pick would be a winner, but if he wants to stay a good stock of ruckmen is not a bad thing to have
    You can't argue with a sick mind - Joe Walsh

  3. #27
    Regular in the Side
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    melbourne
    Posts
    837
    should package him (maybe with Bevan and another) to get hands on one of the 17 yr olds they have to trade.

  4. #28
    On the Rookie List Robbo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    2,946
    He's too good to be playing reserves every week, but I would be sad to see him go. People seem to forget that he was actually ahead of Mumford at the start of 2010 and was playing exceptionally well before he broke his ankle against Brisbane in about round 5. He has been very good for us in the games he has played in 2011 aswell, and if it wasn't for the new sub rule he would still be in the side.

    Clearly a better overall player than Pyke, and I would be worried if we lost Seaby and Pyke became our 2nd ruckman.

  5. #29
    Veterans List aardvark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Down South
    Posts
    5,681
    Discussion on SEN this morning suggested the Bullies may be looking for a ruckman as Hudson will retire, Minson is a dud and young Roughhead isn't ready yet. Seaby would be a good fit there and we have a recent history of trading with the bullies.

  6. #30
    Formerly 'BBB' Triple B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    6,999
    It's a tough one because the AFL are so unpredictable with how they go about their rules and changes. Next year they may well decide to go with 4 on the bench and a sub in which case a true second ruck may well again become fashionable.

    Of course if those changes are made, they will be well after the trade period which happens within a fortnight of the GF hooter sounding for the last time of the year.
    Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

  7. #31
    Regular in the Side
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    The Glorious Peoples Republic of Hookturnistan
    Posts
    813
    Quote Originally Posted by Robbo View Post
    He's too good to be playing reserves every week, but I would be sad to see him go. People seem to forget that he was actually ahead of Mumford at the start of 2010 and was playing exceptionally well before he broke his ankle against Brisbane in about round 5. He has been very good for us in the games he has played in 2011 aswell, and if it wasn't for the new sub rule he would still be in the side.

    Clearly a better overall player than Pyke, and I would be worried if we lost Seaby and Pyke became our 2nd ruckman.
    +1
    sprite

  8. #32
    Senior Player GongSwan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Wollongong NSW
    Posts
    1,362
    Freo might be looking for a ruckman if Sandi can't get rid of his toe jam, few youngsters there to pick from
    You can't argue with a sick mind - Joe Walsh

  9. #33
    Salt future's rising SimonH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Gala Mill
    Posts
    1,647
    For a surprise, have a look at the last couple of paras of this piece.

    Ruckman Daniel Currie?s injured foot hasn?t progressed over the last week and he is unlikely to feature again in 2011.

    ?We?re letting him now just work on his injuries and get ready for the off-season,? Cameron said.
    Implying that he's got an ongoing spot on the Swans' list? Borderline bizarre. I say that as one who would have dearly loved to see Dan Currie make it. But unless the Swans have got some inside mail on the AFL reverting to a pre-2011 interchange rule in 2012, us keeping him would be only a slightly smaller surprise than us re-drafting Heath James.

    The other alternative is that it's a little in-joke, and he actually means 'the long, long off-season, AKA the rest of your life'.

  10. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by SimonH View Post
    For a surprise, have a look at the last couple of paras of this piece.

    Implying that he's got an ongoing spot on the Swans' list? Borderline bizarre. I say that as one who would have dearly loved to see Dan Currie make it. But unless the Swans have got some inside mail on the AFL reverting to a pre-2011 interchange rule in 2012, us keeping him would be only a slightly smaller surprise than us re-drafting Heath James.

    The other alternative is that it's a little in-joke, and he actually means 'the long, long off-season, AKA the rest of your life'.
    That or the physio just didn't want to imply Currie would probably be delisted on the club's website, since that would be a little bit rough on him.
    Officially on the Reid and Sumner bandwagon!

  11. #35
    Can you feel it? Site Admin ugg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Chucked into the ruck
    Posts
    15,934
    or maybe the fact that the physio would have little idea about the contract status of players.

  12. #36
    does anyone remember what pick etc that we gave West Coast for Seabs to join us ?
    "be tough, only when it gets tough"


Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO