You just never know. The best and fairest gets lost a bit, I think. This is why I can't stand the bleating from St. Jobe. Sure, Dusty does have form with Brownlow votes, but it comes down to the umpire's discretion. While he doesn't seem to be the demonstrative type, there is the (slightest) possibility that he rubs the umps up the wrong way, and doesn't poll the votes everyone has him pegged for.
C'mon Chels!
Rance is good, but way overrated here in Melbourne.
Sure, he may "only" poll 30 or so votes, rather than the 35+ that some are predicting. But I can't see any other player other than maybe the ineligible Dangerfield getting close to 25 votes. Someone like Mitchell gets a lot of the ball but he does so unobtrusively, and in any case, Hawthorn were dreadful in quite a few of their games, which will impact him getting maximum votes even where he was the busiest player on the ground.
kZM8YAe.png
Tough gig every year to do the selections. Both Luke and Josh weren't at their regular high level all season, but neither was Joel this year.
The above doesn't show clearances;
Selwood 6.3 per game (114 total)
Kennedy 6.9 per game (131 total)
Parker 6.4 per game (140 total)
I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time
Selwood gets as many free kicks as he takes marks!
How the hell do you play against someone who has more than 10% of his disposals from free kicks?
Thanks Stellation for these stats ... on this analysis JPK probably deserved that bench spot ... an eye opener that Josh gets very few free kicks while the Sellwood stats are inflated by them ... and it would be interesting to see (not that I question his bravery) how many are of the "here I am catch me high after I very neatly duck my head type at exactly the right moment type" which Kennedy NEVER does. The bravery thing is way overstated ... anyone prepared to say he is braver than Kennedy?
Bookmarks