Will the ACCC come down on us and the Dons for collusion if we get together before the game and agree not to pick any ruckmen?
Will the ACCC come down on us and the Dons for collusion if we get together before the game and agree not to pick any ruckmen?
One advantage of bringing in Knoll for this game is the lack of a strong opponent he will be up against. That wouldn't happen too often.
I think Essendon will bring Zac Clarke back in and if that is the case I think we will need to play Knoll. A relatively easy debut.
I would prefer to have the rucking performed mainly by a ruckman - Knoll or Amartey. However if both of those are definitely not ready, then bring back Thurlow to free up Aliir.
Also why drop Ronke? I felt he did enough. Not setting the world on fire, but enough.
The team is preforming credibly, so one change is enough for me.
Yeah think we have to debut Knoll, I don't think we have any other choice
Mummy csme out of retirement, would Tom Derickx be able to squeeze the Bombers game around his modelling commitments?
I think Knoll looked ok against GC on Saturday. He could match it with Nicholls in the ruck who is one of the more experienced NEAFL rucks going around. Certainly has improved over his first few outings. I think it would be worth giving him a go, especially if Clarke is the best he comes up against. I would take Nicholls over him, he's a shocker.
On the other selection issues, if Cunningham and Macca are fit, and going to play, who to drop? Maybe Ronke and Florent?
Bookmarks