Thanks from me also for this article link. Interesting that he thinks Tom Hickey is in AA form when he broke down his stats so far this year. Definitely exceeding all expectations.
He (along with Gerard Healy & Montagna) doesn't believe Hickey had proper prior to be deemed HTB when he grabbed the ball from the throw in. This appears to be divisive decision amongst people on this thread & in the footy world, unlike the HTB in the Geelong v Brisbane game which DID determine outcome of the game. For this reason I can't understand why the Hickey decision has gained so much attention when it occurred on our defensive 50 with 40 secs left, very hypothetical from there on. AFL backing that decision appears within reason.
On viewing replay, I'm perplexed why in the last quarter the umpire called "advantage" after Papley had stopped with his hand up after hearing whistle free paid to Buddy, who was in his kicking distance just outside 50m arc. Surely this would've got equal attention had we lost? The commentators noted the player normally gets the benefit of doubt when they stop like that.
Last edited by KSAS; 10th April 2021 at 10:13 AM.
Yes, I noted that effort of Errol's earlier in the thread. And I probably shouldn't overdo the comparisons to Paul Kelly, but when Kelly was in his prime, if he was in the general vicinity of the ball, I always felt confident that he would emerge with the ball. Even if there was two or three opposition players closer to the ball than him. I'm starting to feel the way about Gulden and Warner. If they're near the ball, good things tend to happen.
And there were a few momentum changing efforts. For Essendon, Hind's sprint from half back, through the middle, to set up a goal, was certainly one. And late in the game for us, Harry Cunningham somehow forcing his way through congestion and hoisting the ball into our forward line, had me taking a breath and thinking, 'yes, we've got this.'
I also enjoy reading the Mongrel Punt reports on our games. They're much more insightful and observant, than what's dished up on the AFL site: which seems to work on a lowest common denominator principle.
From here on we need to win 8 games from the next 18 to make the finals so I would think, more of a chance to reach than not to reach finals.
I guess we will have to see how we reach finals - limp into it because of blistering start to the season or smash into it. But our seniors will make sure that our performance is even through the year and we have a good list of players waiting to come in so I am hopeful to not just limp into the finals.
But it’s for sure the tactics against us would be to prevent the chip passing and it will be important for us to toggle between the Longmire school and Don Pyke school of attack. But stick to the Longmire school of defence.
I think this is it? https://twitter.com/7afl/status/1380...241672705?s=21
Looks like it was made before Thursday so he was probably assuming we were going to lose to his old mob 😅
Bookmarks