Round 19 - Sydney Swans v Fremantle @Gold Coast

[wolftone57]

We still outscored them in the last.....not too bad when the cue is essentially in the rack.

Yeah and so we should have with Fyfe out. Lose Fyfe and you lose at least 18 disposals in the second half. We coasted in the last.

Sent from my JAT-L29 using Tapatalk

[stevoswan]

Shuey apologized; Buddy didn't. Goes to the question of intent.

Faux regret with an eye on his pending penalty.....a shallow apology perhaps?

[caj23]

Routine win got the job done

Shame we didn’t do the same earlier in the season we could’ve been % from 3rd spot

[dejavoodoo44]

Errol was just interviewed on ABC Radio. He's very articulate.

[stevoswan]

Yeah and so we should have with Fyfe out. Lose Fyfe and you lose at least 18 disposals in the second half. We coasted in the last.

As I said, with a view to the coming weeks with a lot saying we looked tired. Why bust their gut for a few % pts? Still won by 40.....I can't complain about that.

- - - Updated - - -

Errol was just interviewed on ABC Radio. He's very articulate.

He's such an asset.....totally dialled in to what the club needs and expects from every player.

[lwjoyner]

again fox commentators against swans. not one on fox is at least even handed when broadcasting us. Must also say channel people are much the same. Footscray get away their throws always and no comments from them.

[TheBloods]

Kennedy Parker Heeney Dawson McCartin Rampe very good

Bell belongs in this team , has great attack . Florent showed some clever moments , still doesnt get enough of it. Fox under rated, Hickey had a good second half , Gulden's work rate is excellent but thought his disposal was a bit off , wasnt hitting targets as cleanly as he usually does , thats OK not every game will be perfect

Solid win

[dejavoodoo44]

ABC radio votes from Shane Woewodin: Heeney 3 votes; Kennedy 2; Parker 1. Seems fair enough.

[Agent 86]

Bell and Ronke are our weak links. Stephens, Warner, Campbell and even Taylor would be significant improvements

I’m yet to be convinced that Stephens is ready (either on or off the field) to be thrown in at this point in time. Chad should come in when fit. Squizzy? Not sure.

Ronke rarely sighted today & maybe Campbell should get another crack.

Bell and Wicks are vying for a spot - imho, Bell has an edge in effort & 1%ers - but Wicks the edge in attack. Neither certain starters in full strength team, but I dunno…

Buddy could benefit from a rest, so a week off will not be a disaster (unless the Vic press get involved and any suspension is longer than warranted) - unfortunately I always like to see him up against the bombers.

[snajik]

The setting of the mark has become a complete debacle this season with the 'standing' rule.....a dogs breakfast and frankly it's a joke now.

Do I ever agree with this. In less than a season it's become a blight on the game. It's quite simple. Just stand precisely where the mark was taken and don't move.

[snajik]

I am sorry for the previous comment. I was extremely emotional at the time. The comment was only directed to strategy. It was the first strategically flawed campaign in any field I could think of. Of course I could have mentioned the 'Where the Bloody Hell Are You' advertising disaster I suppose.



Sent from my JAT-L29 using Tapatalk

I wouldn't lose any sleep over this. Analogies invariably add colour. Though I might have gone with his post-election campaign. A new and improved version of swiss cheese.

[Nico]

We have to get these centre clearances to at least 50/50. Even with Fyfe and Walters off they kept getting the ball out.

Our kicking accuracy was not as good this week and we didn't go as much through the midfield.

Mills and Cunningham will be welcome returns next week.

I thought for much of the game our sharpness was down as was our running to space. We did enough against a depleted team.