I went and looked at the stats. He did have a lot of possessions and topped the Dreamtime (name?) score. But I think a lot of that was just useless short possessions in the Eagles' back half.
I listened to the first few minutes of the Damo and Nat podcast on the AFL site this morning. They mentioned that the umpires now have access to the match stats before they cast their votes. That may explain - in part - why the mids who get huge amounts of ball dominate the votes nowadays, even if, sometimes, their impact isn't borne out by possession numbers.
(It doesn't entirely explain away the current day dominance of the Brownlow by midfielders because, as that podcast also points out, pretty much every other award, including the AFLCA award, is also dominated by midfielders.)
Hi Liz,
I thought about this too, and came to a reasonable conclusion I hope.
The disparity between a midfielders dominant games and quiet games is a lot less than say a key forward or a defender or a small forward.
A midfielder who averages 30 possessions like Macrae or Wines could have a "quiet game" by their standards and only get 20-25. That could still be enough to net them a vote here and there. But a forward needs to regularly get a bag of goals to poll consistent votes, because 4.1 looks very different to 1.1.
I'm hoping the 'breaking the drought' fairytale which got the Pups over the line in 2016 gets the Dees over the line this year. It shouldn't be this way but if the Dogs get robbed and the Dees win.....it will be sweet sweet karma!
Then we can witness the self unaware hypocrisy from Fairypup fans as they cry "We were robbed!"
The Bont had a look on his face after the brownlow count of "... how could the umpires not gift me the brownlow?... "
Its become an expectation out near the sewerage works of werribee.
I went back and checked a write up of that game, largely because I couldn't remember if it was Sheed or Shuey that elbowed Mills (it was Shuey). But the Mongrel Punt article that I landed on, was discussing why they didn't include Sheed as one of their best players for the day. They pointed out, that while Sheed had just as many disposals as their BOG, Mills; Sheed's disposal efficiency was 45%, compared to the 76% achieved by Mills.
Mills five BOG's, developing nicely :-)
Bookmarks