There are 10 types of people in this world. Those that get binary and those that don’t.
All this proves is that BBBH can be a great bloke off the field......that has never been in question. Never. Great blokes can still be flawed on field and Barry had his flaws, that is without question. Just a reminder.....Chad rang Barry only after Horse asked him to. Dylan Stephens rang Gerard Healy after being asked to....and so on....so not sure what the actual point of your post is.
09183305 makes a good point about knowing what Barry and Chad actually talked about, so here's some 'speculation' for you.....something you're very familiar with. Barry may have said to Chad "......and don't let any negative off-field events influence your on-field actions like I did at times. Stay focussed on the task and never let your team mates down with selfish actions when things aren't going your way. The clubs culture is everything.....never betray it."
Sound ok? More likely than some of the drivel being put up on this thread in recent days.
One more thing. One person on this thread has denied BBBH was a champion player. I believe he is alone on this and as such it doesn't reflect that basically all of us here believe he was a champion. You just can't seem to accept that he had flaws which were contrary to the culture that had been built at the Swans and that his team mates, however young, had the right to point this out to him.....'because he was a champion that deserves respect'.
None of his negative on field actions respected the clubs culture or helped the team in any way and he deserved to be told.....and in any post 'negative event' analysis, that's all he deserved.....so it matters little who it came from, whether it be from Horse or a younger team mate.
Would it have been better if the YU said to Barry "It's ok mate, we all saw Staker niggling you all day long and the umpires do nothing to protect you. He got what he deserved. Well done mate, we've got your back. Here's some more cotton wool". Give me a break.
Last edited by stevoswan; 25th January 2022 at 12:43 PM.
Thankfully you seem to agree with most of us on the fact that a YU has the right to pull 'a champion' into line....which is how this never ending debate started.
Sadly, you seem to have missed the point that it's only one poster that believes he was 'a good average player'.....and also that it was post 2005 when he was not such a 'solid citizen'. It's likely that this is the time period the YU rightly addressed this with him in said team meeting.
By your own admission, we don't win the 2005 GF without Barry....well lucky he had enough 'solid citizen' points in the bank to get off the Maguire charge then isn't it.....otherwise he may have been remembered as having lost us a flag. As I said in an earlier post, what a wonderful legacy that would have been.....and all from his 'solid citizen' period. Wow.
But yes, it is fantastic to have him back. No doubt all Swans fans love Barry, despite his flaws and indeed in spite of some on here glossing over some uncomfortable truths of the past.
Last edited by stevoswan; 25th January 2022 at 01:18 PM.
You still just don't get it. You're doubling down and clutching at speculative straws like a Murdoch journo....it's cringeworthy. Jack and McVeigh never king hit anybody, never even got reported (correct me if I'm wrong on this). They 100% respected the Swans culture 100% of the time and they weren't in self imposed purgatory like BBBH was. By this time, he had burnt his bridges well and truly.....no one felt good about the way his time at the Swans ended and anyone with any common sense would understand that a 'farewell' game would have been a pretty hollow experience for everyone involved.....even disingenuous.
- - - Updated - - -
Bookmarks