Rnd 21, vs North Melbourne at Marvel, on Sunday 7 August, 1:10 PM

[KTigers]

That's definitely Luffy!

The guy with the headphones and sleeve stripe on his jacket looks like Troy to me. I used to know him a little.
He corrected me one time when I shorted his games played total by one.

[gloveski]

Hickey’s not fit though.

More of a statement if all three were fit , could we potentially play all 3 of Reid , Hickey and Ladhams and still not take away from the team structure


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[bloodspirit]

More of a statement if all three were fit , could we potentially play all 3 of Reid , Hickey and Ladhams and still not take away from the team structure


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Possibly we could.... but it would be at the expense of Logan/Amartey/McLean.

[TheBloods]

More of a statement if all three were fit , could we potentially play all 3 of Reid , Hickey and Ladhams and still not take away from the team structure


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Too slow

[jono2707]

The guy with the headphones and sleeve stripe on his jacket looks like Troy to me. I used to know him a little.
He corrected me one time when I shorted his games played total by one.

It certainly is Luffy 😊

[Hotpotato]

Is there a case for resting Buddy for this game?

Nope .

[Aprilbr]

I really don't think we should play both Hickey and Ladhams either. We will need plenty of speed and running in the finals. Its not like either will be likely to clunk a lot of marks up forward. Better to go with one of McDonald, Armetey or McLean up forward instead. Its a toss up between those three at present. All bring different attributes to the table. If we play finals at the MCG which will happen if we make the final 4 (Melb or Geelong), then I think McDonald is the best bet on the wide open spaces with his ability to cover ground well and kick long (albeit not always straight).

[Captain]

No way Ladhams should play. It’s no coincidence that we win more when he doesn’t play.

If Hickey is injured I would rather Reid and Amartey share the ruck load. They would be more than capable, especially with the great form Sammy is in.

[Agent 86]

The drop of almost 4 was for that specific example of an 80-81 loss (or a 81-80 win).

If they lose 0-1, their percentage drops almost nothing, the same as if they win 1-0.

If they lose 100 to 101, they will lose more percentage than the 80-81 scenario (or a 101-100 win).

The percentage is their total scores from all games, divided by their total scores against. So if they have to keep scoring 131.6 points to every 100 points the opponents score to maintain their 131.6 percentage.

So narrow wins or losses will still hurt them a lot percentage wise, and more so if it is larger scores by each team (as then the ratio of scores against scores against narrows by more).

Okay, so it’s not whether you win or lose but how you play the game?

But, anyway, my inner pedant was still not convinced.

1653/1256 * 100 = 131.6
1734/1336 * 100 = 129.8

Or am I doing it wrong?

But I get the point overall… when you’ve got a healthy percentage, a tight win means you’ll still lose percentage.

[Agent 86]

The guy with the headphones and sleeve stripe on his jacket looks like Troy to me. I used to know him a little.
He corrected me one time when I shorted his games played total by one.

I was pretty sure it was Luffy. Quite a distinctive snoz.

[bandwagon]

No way Ladhams should play. It’s no coincidence that we win more when he doesn’t play.

7W-3L with Hickey in the team
7W-4L with Ladhams in the team
Ladhams has polled 15 coaches votes, Hickey zero this season.

My opinion is that we need both of them match fit going into September.

[Maltopia]

Okay, so it’s not whether you win or lose but how you play the game?

But, anyway, my inner pedant was still not convinced.

1653/1256 * 100 = 131.6
1734/1336 * 100 = 129.8

Or am I doing it wrong?

But I get the point overall… when you’ve got a healthy percentage, a tight win means you’ll still lose percentage.

Yep you have it right, except the 80-81 loss would be 1733/1337x100 = 129.6

I had 127.7 which means I must have typed in 1357 (80-101 loss) in error.