Page 5 of 12 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast
Results 49 to 60 of 135

Thread: Rnd 21, vs North Melbourne at Marvel, on Sunday 7 August, 1:10 PM

  1. #49
    Quote Originally Posted by Agent 86 View Post
    Okay, so it’s not whether you win or lose but how you play the game?

    But, anyway, my inner pedant was still not convinced.

    1653/1256 * 100 = 131.6
    1734/1336 * 100 = 129.8

    Or am I doing it wrong?

    But I get the point overall… when you’ve got a healthy percentage, a tight win means you’ll still lose percentage.
    There’s perhaps even more to it than that. At the start of the season, wins and losses will have a bigger impact on percentage and percentage changes than later in the season, as the for & against scores are cumulative over the season. Also it’s not just a close loss, as a close loss in a lower scoring game has a bigger impact on percentage than a close loss in a higher scoring game early in the season, but this is progressively reversed as the season progresses.

    Let’s go to extremes with an unlikely hypothetical.

    Round 1 of the season: the Swans defeat GW$ in a low scoring affair 0.2(2) to 0.1(1), gives the Swans a percentage of 200%

    Same round, the Cats just get over the line against the Dees in a goal fest 30.21(201) to 30.20(200) giving Geelong a far less healthy % of 100.5.

    Same winning margin, vastly different impact on % at the very start of the season.

    Fast forward to the start of round 23. The Geelong and the Swans sit tied on top of the ladder the ladder. Incredibly, both have identical number of wins & losses with identical for/against points of 1786 for/1318 against, both having a percentage of 135.5%

    As luck would have it, the Swans play and defeat GW$ with an identical round 1 scoreline Syd 0.2(2) def GW$ 0.1(1). And astonishingly Geelong replicate their Round 1 scoreline against the Dees with a 201 to 200 victory!

    This gives Sydney 1788 for/1319 against and a slightly improved percentage of 135.6%. Geelong’s end of H&A percentage is 1987 for/1518 against giving a percentage of 130.9%

    There are a number of things we can take away from that improbable hypothetical:

    1) lower scoring matches have a much larger impact on % at the start of the season than at the end of the season because of the cumulative for/against ratio by the end of the season

    2) winning margins are more significant for lower scoring matches

    My example doesn’t show this as I would need more
    complexed hypotheticals, but a larger percentage requires much bigger wins to maintain it (ie a narrow win, if you have a high percentage will almost invariably cause your percentage to drop).
    Last edited by goswannies; 3rd August 2022 at 12:12 AM.

  2. #50
    Veterans List
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Crowland :-(
    Posts
    6,109
    Nice work goswannies.

    It's important to keep your opposition to a low score as the % boost is greater for the same margin where you keep the opposition score low, as we did against GWS.

    No changes this week, Kennedy medi sub again as he played a full reserves game.

  3. #51
    There were 6 changes to the team that played last weekend to those playing against North earlier in the year

    Hickey for Ladhams
    Amarty for McLean
    Stephens for Campbell
    Clarke for Kennedy
    Papley for Bell
    Fox for Cunningham

    Looks stronger to me

  4. #52
    Senior Player
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Sunshine Coast
    Posts
    1,548
    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Man View Post
    There were 6 changes to the team that played last weekend to those playing against North earlier in the year

    Hickey for Ladhams
    Amarty for McLean
    Stephens for Campbell
    Clarke for Kennedy
    Papley for Bell
    Fox for Cunningham

    Looks stronger to me
    I tend to agree apart from Kennedy - Clarke but maybe that’s simply nostalgia

  5. #53
    Veterans List
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Crowland :-(
    Posts
    6,109
    Norf set to make about 6 or 7 changes

  6. #54
    Quote Originally Posted by 707 View Post
    Norf set to make about 6 or 7 changes
    Including the possible return of Cunnington

  7. #55
    Suspended by the MRP
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Location
    Sydney, NSW
    Posts
    2,047
    Quote Originally Posted by Markwebbos View Post
    Including the possible return of Cunnington
    No

    He is in the VFL , first game back in a year . Good to see

  8. #56
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBloods View Post
    No

    He is in the VFL , first game back in a year . Good to see
    North Melbourne Roos faced with emotional decision on champion Ben Cunnington's return (afl.com.au)

    "It’s probably going to be the VFL, even though we’d love it to be straight back in.
    "Deep down I know he’d love to play seniors, particularly being a game in Melbourne this weekend and we travel next weekend.
    All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

  9. #57
    Veterans List Ludwig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Chiang Mai
    Posts
    9,310
    Quote Originally Posted by Mountain Man View Post
    There were 6 changes to the team that played last weekend to those playing against North earlier in the year

    Hickey for Ladhams
    Amarty for McLean
    Stephens for Campbell
    Clarke for Kennedy
    Papley for Bell
    Fox for Cunningham

    Looks stronger to me
    The big difference is Papley in for Bell. A huge difference is more like it.

    Clarke is not in the same league as Kennedy, but fills a more important role for us in that we have replaced our weakest link in defence with a shut down defensive forward. We've played a much stronger defensive game since Clarke took on this role.

    More than player upgrades, the Swans have been looking more like a team with a real game plan, banking on solid defending to create turnovers to release a highly skilled and hard running offense.

    Championship teams come out every week and play at a consistently high level. So it's really up to us how thing roll on this year. We are not dependent on a weak opposition to get us through.

  10. #58
    Quote Originally Posted by bloodspirit View Post
    North Melbourne Roos faced with emotional decision on champion Ben Cunnington's return (afl.com.au)

    "It’s probably going to be the VFL, even though we’d love it to be straight back in.
    "Deep down I know he’d love to play seniors, particularly being a game in Melbourne this weekend and we travel next weekend.
    Its great he is back but it would be a big ask for him to march straight back into the Seniors after not playing for 12 months. I think that would be throwing him to the wolves as he is not match hardened.

  11. #59
    Veterans List
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    Castlemaine, Vic.
    Posts
    8,215
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBloods View Post
    No

    He is in the VFL , first game back in a year . Good to see
    Yep, happy to see him back after his battle.

  12. #60
    scott names the planets stellation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    peaches eaten, trousers rolled
    Posts
    9,699
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Aprilbr View Post
    Its great he is back but it would be a big ask for him to march straight back into the Seniors after not playing for 12 months. I think that would be throwing him to the wolves as he is not match hardened.
    Particularly after a calf concern and then Covid just a week ago. Great to see him return, and will be a big boost for Roos fans- but if he's been out for so long and they're keen for him return in Melbourne then surely give him 2 weeks in the magoos since they will be back in Melbourne in a fortnight to finish the season.
    I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
    We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

Page 5 of 12 FirstFirst 123456789 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO