That's exactly what I was thinking, a very usefull commodity.Originally posted by Thunder Shaker
A defender that can play forward when needed. A bit like Hunter in the GF.
That's exactly what I was thinking, a very usefull commodity.Originally posted by Thunder Shaker
A defender that can play forward when needed. A bit like Hunter in the GF.
Loose translation from the Latin is - I am tall, so I hit out.
Or Leppitsch.Originally posted by Thunder Shaker
A defender that can play forward when needed. A bit like Hunter in the GF.
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."
or silvagni
or bradshaw
Roosy = LEGEND
Or Dunkley... oops...
Maybe Shauble instead.
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."
He will have to get a go, if he features in our long term plans. He turns 23 in a few months. He's not going to wait forever, and he *should* be out of contract at the end of the year. I see him as a full-forward down the track - O'Loughlin is likely to retire in 2008-9. But in the meantime we can certainly do with another option down back.Originally posted by barry
Vogels may not get much of a go in 2006 either, but by 2007 I expect Leo Barry to hand over the reins of full back to Vogels, with Leo off to the pocket of half back flank.
We are fortunate to have four young KPP options in Richards, Grundy, Vogels and Roberts-Thomson. If we can keep them all - and assuming, of course, they all develop as expected, then that is our spine for much of the next decade. Not before time, too, with Mick, Baz and Leo all 29 this year. I still fear we'll rue not taking another young tall as a backup in the '06 draft, but that can't be changed now. Hopefully the four of them all cement a spot so it doesn't become a problem. Releasing Leo back to a flank/back pocket would be a luxury.
We hate Anthony Rocca
We hate Shannon Grant too
We hate scumbag Gaspar
But Leo WE LOVE YOU!
Dunkley went forward a few times, with some success.Originally posted by NMWBloods
Or Dunkley... oops...
Yes, a few bizarre helicopter punt goals, yet I always associate him going forward and kicking goals with us getting smacked.Originally posted by ScottH
Dunkley went forward a few times, with some success.
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboat.
"[T]here are things that matter more and he's reading and thinking about them: heaven, reincarnation. Life and death are the only things that are truly a matter of life and death. Not football."
LOL, probably right, I don't remember the outcomes.Originally posted by NMWBloods
Yes, a few bizarre helicopter punt goals, yet I always associate him going forward and kicking goals with us getting smacked.
Ed:
2.5 games won with him kicking goals, the others were losses (sometimes floggings), this includes the drawn out draw against the Saints.
Do you have a time machine?Originally posted by Charlie
I still fear we'll rue not taking another young tall as a backup in the '06 draft, but that can't be changed now.
What did I say the other day about people quoting a typo?
We hate Anthony Rocca
We hate Shannon Grant too
We hate scumbag Gaspar
But Leo WE LOVE YOU!
But if it was a typo, and you meant the 2005 draft, what about Currie, Wall, Barlow, Rowe and Prior. Surely they were all drafted as additional "developing" talls.Originally posted by Charlie
What did I say the other day about people quoting a typo?
And before you point the obvious out to me that they were all taken in the rookie draft, so were Grundy, Vogels and Shaw a year earlier.
Unbelievably he was recruited as a forwardOriginally posted by ScottH
Dunkley went forward a few times, with some success.
Bookmarks