Its of no relevance to Goodes in 2008.
We're talking about Mike Sheahan's Top 50 (which, we all agree, needs a little tweaking).
Somewhere along the line, I said the brownlow determined who was the "best" (implying that Mike Sheahan had nothing to do with it).
Then you said the brownlow was of little relevance [compared to Sheahan's list] (or words to that effect) - that was my interpretation of what I thought you meant.
Than I said that the person who wins the brownlow is remembered as the best player for that year, i.e. Cooney for 2008 (or words to that effect). I used Goodesy's as an example of the No. 1 player in 2006 and one of a three-way tie in 2003.
Just because Mike Sheahan doesn't rate Goodesy in his Top 50 doesn't mean that Goodesy doesn't rate in "a" Top 50.
In the ratings that count (i.e. charlie votes), Goodesy came 5th.
I think I'd prefer the umpires take on a game than Mike Sheahans. They are, after all, a lot closer to the action.
Bookmarks